• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    The future of internet is you have to ask your government for permission before you can visit foreign websites.

    There is no longer “Internet”

    It will be suceeded by:

    • Freedom Net (where “Antifa” is Banned, and you need a swastica armband to get access)

    • Euronet (where UK just left, again)

    • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (they noped out of the UK, and re-re-joined the EU)

    • Putin’s #1 Digital Fan Club

    • 中华人民解放互联网 (People’s Liberated Internet)

    • And that’s it, Canada and Mexico got Invaded by the US; while UK, EU, Russia, China all fought over the remaining of the world

    (okay maybe my worldbuilding is ridiculous, but the world is collapsing and I want to write a story about my predictions of the future mm’kay? 😉)

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Thank fuck the corporate silo era is (slowly) coming to an end. And they tried so hard to turn it into TV 2.0.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Depends on how you measure things. If you pie-chart the internet by bandwidth used, most of it is currently used for TV 2.0 (streaming video, mostly by subscription.)

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I really don’t consider streaming services to be the “real” internet. It’s video on demand, and not a communication, socialization and creation space like the rest of the net.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          True, but everyone paying for “broadband internet” is paying that premium for the fat pipes to carry video on demand.

          The communication, socialization and creation space might use less than 10% of the bandwidth, less than 0.1% if you take video out of it.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Curated experiences are the reason we’re in the shit right now.

    But yeah, maybe boutique curated exepriences will somehow be qualitatively different, and not just finer market segmentation.

      • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I’d say genuine. Genuine experiences. Sharing shit for sharing’s sake. Not for better SEO. Not for profit. Just unadulterated human expression.

        That’s how I envision using the internet for entertainment in the near future. I’ll still use the shitty corporate sites when I must, for transactional browsing. I’m not going to pretend I can push Amazon, Microsoft, Google, online banking, etc. out of my life just like that.

        But I will actively seek authentic spaces. They will be a tad smaller than your average social network, Reddit, and whatnot. But I’m certain they’re out there and more people will join me in this search and populate these small spaces as time goes on.

        Lemmy, Mastodon, the IndieWeb movement. The first steps. I hope to find more!

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Smaller communities don’t get targeted for commercial exploitation. But, then, something has to support them even if they don’t cost much to run - they still cost something, both for bandwidth/storage and moderation/curation effort.

          • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Of course. I have nothing against Fediverse server admins setting up a Patreon —ideally Liberapay— or something similar to receive donations to cover running costs. I have and continue to contribute financially to indie devs or server admins when I can.

            Not everyone will do that of course. But there again, running stuff at a small scale shouldn’t be crazy expensive either. The operational costs of keeping a microblog or indie site running are little to none. I host my blog and all of my side projects for free in a cloud provider.

            Running a Fediverse server is more expensive. Last time I looked into what it would roughly cost to stand up a barebones stack to host a Mastodon server in a public cloud, it was like a hundred bucks a month. Not cheap but it may be big enough to house a couple thousand users. If at least 0.5% of your userbase donated some money to cover running costs, you might be ok.

            Alternatively, if you have a server lying around at home, loads of people self-host at home, which is a tad cheaper.

            I’m not saying a fully decentralised indie internet wouldn’t have its shortcomings, of course. I’m just saying I’d happily take that over the current state of the web.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              For what it’s worth, I looked around and saw “ready to run” Mastodon hosting services starting at $6 per month, not too long ago. Tempting, but the service is the easy part, maintaining the community can be much more challenging.