Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this, and happy new year in advance.)

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That first post. They are using llms to create quantum resistant crypto systems? Eyelid twitch

    E: also, as I think cryptography is the only part of CS which really attracts cranks, this made me realize how much worse science crankery is going to get due to LLMs.

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      As self and khalid_salad said, there are certainly other branches of CS that attract cranks. I’m not much of a computer scientist myself but even I have seen some 🤔-ass claims about compilers, computational complexity, syntactic validity of the entire C programming language (?), and divine approval or lack thereof of particular operating systems and even the sorting algorithms used in their schedulers!

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I thought those non crypto cranks were relatively rare, which is why I added the “really” part. There has been only one templeos after all. And cryptography (crypto too but that is more financial cranks) has that 'this will ve revolutionary feeling which cranks seem to love, while also feeling accessable (compared to complexity theory, which you usually only know about if you know some cs already). I didn’t mean there are no cranks/weird ass claims about the whole field, but Id think that cryptography attracts the lions share. The lambda calculus bit down thread might prove me wrong however.

        • bitofhope@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I know what you mean. I think the main genre of CS cranks is people trying way too hard to prove something they’ve gotten way too attached to and cryptography (and its more or less obviously stupid applications) and functional programming (proven to be no more or less powerful than procedural, but sometimes more or less fun) seem to attract a particularly high share of cranks. Almost certainly other fields too.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I still need to finish that FPGA Krivine machine because it’s still living rent-free in my head and will do so until it’s finally evaluating expressions, but boy howdy fuck am I not looking forward to the cranks finding it

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            also sprinkle it at the start, and throughout

            because you just know the tiring fuckers won’t bother reading in depth

    • khalid_salad@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think cryptography is the only part of CS which really attracts cranks

      every once in a while we get a “here is a compression scheme that works on all data, fuck you and your pidgins” but yeah i think this is right

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        there’s unfortunately a lot of cranks around lambda calculus and computability (specifically check out the Wikipedia article on hypercomputation and start chasing links; you’re guaranteed to find at least one aggressive crank editing their favorite grift into the less watched corners of the wiki), and a lot of them have TESCREAL roots or some ties to that belief cluster or to technofascism, because it’s much easier to form a computer death cult when your idea of computation is utterly fucked

        • khalid_salad@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          fair, there are cranks still trying to trisect an arbitrary angle with an unmarked straight-edge and compass, so i shouldn’t be surprised. there are probably cranks still trying to solve the halting problem