• xavier666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Win 98

    This isn’t true, this can’t be true and I refuse to believe it.

    • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @xavier666 @vaultdweler13, it’s true, For internal use with PCs connected to the central server itself and not to the network, it is used for compatibility with corporate software, sometimes still very old Windows. This, when using it on the one hand only in a specialized way and on the other hand only locally, is more than enough. The same in factories in production for the automation of some valve or machinery with repetitive processes, a super-pc with a NASA OS is not needed.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For PCs at workshop, I can understand Win98. The OS is just a bootloader to a single application. But for banking, it’s a terrible security hazard.

        • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          @xavier666, only if it is used in subsidiaries where they have to manage money movements over the network, but not in local administrative applications where it is irrelevant, as in all purely local uses. In monoapplications in this area, even an old MsDOS will be worth it.
          They have traveled to the Moon with an SO from a Tamagochi.