An estimated $4 to $20 billion in value, what is he thinking?

    • bermuda@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes but he built it in las vegas. It has a few stops and relies on teslas, each with a driver, and it functions as a very basic “public transit” system. Almost none of what he initially promised are present in the final design. Originally it was going to be his “hyperloop” thing. Then it was “autonomous vehicles.” Now it’s “teslas driven by people”

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha you are right, he did try to reinvent the subway!

          And any of the problems he mentioned could basically be fixed by spending -more- on public transit, rather than less… with the exception of it leaving from wherever you want and there being other people (though the more they run, the fewer people need to take each).

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s what bugs me about all of his “inventions”, is that they aren’t really new ideas, or even if they are they’re wildly expensive for the benefits. Cities like Vegas look at him and thought “Oh wow finally we’ll solve traffic with these new ideas!” when really they just need to invest in actual proven infrastructure like subways and commuter rail.

            It’s well known that Elon pitched the hyperloop in California because he wanted to kill California’s high speed rail, because he’d rather have people buy Teslas then have an inexpensive fast way to travel between cities. He delayed the project for years over his wild claims, and people are still hesitant to it thanks to his selfishness.

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        from even the most basic comprehension of urban design, a public transit system that carries three passengers per car is not a success “based on … capacity.”

        You also clearly demonstrate a severe lack of comprehension on what the word “slander” actually means. I never said anything that was an outright lie. There are traffic jams, that was the criticism, to which you admitted do happen. So where’s the lie?

      • QHC@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it better than a light rail system, or would that not help sell enough products from a company owned by Musk?

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just trying to hold people accountable for their bullshit. Go fuck yourselves.

        If I recall correctly, you tried to “hold me accountable” by claiming I was slandering him and coming up with lies, when in fact none of what I said was even a lie. In fact, you even said yourself that it gets backed up “sometimes,” which is what I mean by traffic jams.

        It sounds to me like you need to learn what the word slander, actually means. Also, I reported this because it’s rude as hell.

        • figment@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s definitely less than that. The advantages will be when you’re able to get in a vehicle and input your destination and it can go straight there without a single other stop. In theory at least. I’m not saying it’s genius but it’s an interesting concept and I’m curious to see if it works when scaled.