Even through it has some flaws, e.g. it’s not fully memory safe (there are some programming languages that are even safer, like Ada)?

  • ryujin470@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just in my opinion. It’s probably a trending programming language right now. More loved than C or C++ by some developers

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a hyped language because it solves many problems that has persisted with C and C++ - without having to rely on garbage collection.

      If anything, it’s underused. Not that I believe everything should be rewritten in Rust. That’s just stupid.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a C++ developer Rust’s borrow checker is very interesting - it promises to solve my issues with C++ without the issues that make other languages (ie Java, Python…) have in the real world. (remember we choose C++ for a reason, Java isn’t correct for our application - if Java is correct you should use that instead)

        • jansk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If you learn Rust, you’ll find that you’d choose it over C/++ even without the brrow checker. Every little part of the development experience is just so much better.

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Maybe. I have millions of lines of c++ and making rust work with them will often be more work than just implementing the feature in c++

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re upset that new technology is displacing a 50 year old technology with a ton of well known flaws?