• RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bullshit take. Show me one instance of communism implemented in a democracy and I’ll agree to your point, but you can’t because there isn’t one.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure I explicitly struck out all references to communism so I don’t know what you’re talking about. My comment was about the fanciful idealism required to justify capitalism. Show me one instance of capitalism implemented in democracy (which didn’t devolve into cronyism).

      • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Switzerland? Netherlands? Hell, even France, Germany?

        Invoking cronyism as a downside in itself is silly. It’s not what matters, what matters is the quality of life. And just because US and a few other capitalist countries have drank from the neoliberal fountain and are unable to stop, it doesn’t mean that that is the only way. In fact social democracies, of which there are quite a few examples around the world, are pretty much still capitalist democracies whit none of the crap neoliberal ideas lead to.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Every one of those four is a mixed economy with significant central economic planning and regulation. Without substantial oversight, capitalism tends to degrade into private monopolies with feudalistic tendencies over time. Like I said, it’s an idealistic system which looks great until actual people are involved. Then you have to either modify it past anything but a spiritual similarity, or drown in the neoliberal fountain.

          • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every one of those four is a mixed economy with significant central economic planning and regulation.

            Every one of those four economies are democratic capitalist economies. What is mixed?

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              central economic planning and regulation

              The fact that every successful “capitalist” economy is heavily regulated speaks to the efficacy of pure capitalism.

              • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There is no such thing as pure capitalism. If you’re talking about capitalism without regulations, that is called anarcho - capitalism and it doesn’t actually exist anywhere at the moment.