• albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they did that, the USA would sanction the USA. Can’t have those Marxist-Sanderists thinking they own the place.

    • megahertz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I feel like I might understand some of the impulse to restrict resources as a way to ensure all members contribute to society, we can see that this isn’t actually the outcome of such restrictions; this tells me that the motivation isn’t about improving society but rather improving the standing of a select few. It is all about power and control. How do we change the social structure at this point?

      • albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do we change the social structure at this point?

        Here’s an idea that worked in the past!

        • megahertz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we keep finding ourselves in another iteration of the problem, did it really work? There has to be a more permanent solution.

          • albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Care to explain the “another iteration of the problem”? Abolishing slavery ends slavery, abolishing serfdom ends serfdom, abolishing rent ends rent. The Venezuelan case is an example of the latter. You asked how to change the social structure, here’s a tried and true method that has worked from Russia to China to Vietnam to Cuba. You’re free to present your own with better track records.