• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    that was before tanks and instant communication. the army would have been less organized and maybe you could have a chance against the government, especially as a militia. today you don’t.

    you do have a chance against a bunch of fuckwads who threaten you because the party they voted for won and the think they can rape freely now. just not the government.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The last three wars have been pretty recent, and haven’t not gone well against a foe no where near or equal. Not so much as a pyric victory, but an eventual unwillingness to keep wasting time and money and lives, and we just left. What do you call it when you just leave a war failing all your objectives and handing over territory to the enemy?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        what are you talking about? control over your own land is nothing like invading a remote country halfway around the world.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          We have psychos trying to implement a theocratic government and oppressing women and minorities like Afghanistan

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            lol… yeah but i meant in terms of using guns to oppose the government