• Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Support for Russia’s genocidal invasion of Ukraine in no way supports anti-US hegemony stances. They’re literally stealing children and indoctrinating them-the same thing the US did while committing genocide against the First Peoples.

    Just opposing the US doesn’t make Russia the good guys.

    • Kieselguhr [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      They’re literally stealing children and indoctrinating them

      Let’s say there’s a war going on, and let’s say there are war orphans, or children who were already orphans before the war
      Let’s say these children are also native Russian speakers, like many many people in Eastern Ukraine

      1. What should the Russian government do? Send these orphans to orphanages far from the front?

      2. Or: put them on the bus and send them to the Ukrainian government where they ban the Russian language and there are Bandera pictures everywhere?

      Do you seriously believe this is the same as what the Canadians did to the natives?

      I think the extreme version of this, “stealing children”, is on the same level as the “Gaddafi ‘supplies troops with Viagra to encourage massremoved’”

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Russia’s invasion of Ukraine isn’t “genocidal,” what would be closer to genocidal is the West’s intention to fight Russia to the last Ukranian standing. Several times, Russia has tried to reach a peace deal, only for the UK and US to step in and tell Ukraine not to take it. The “stealing of children” is taking orphans from warzones and making sure they don’t die.

      Russia’s goal isn’t to ethnically cleanse Ukraine, nor is it to “de-Nazify” Ukraine. Russia’s goal is to totally ruin Ukraine’s military capabilities as a means to prevent further extension of NATO encirclement around it’s borders. This is a consequence of the 2014 Euromaidan coup, and goes all the way back to the dissolution of the USSR. When the USSR was sliced up and sold to the West for profit, 7 million people died, and a Nationalist movement led to domestic Nationalist bourgeoisie reclaiming industry from the West, beginning a long series of NATO expansion and encirclement to force Russia to open themselves up again for the West to profit.

      No, Russia are not the “good guys.” No Communist believes Russia has morally just intentions and is here to save everyone. Communists believe Russia is acting in its own material interests, and those interests happen to align against US-Hegemony, which Communists see as the primary block for progress.

      Communists have as such advocated for both countries to negotiate a cease-fire since the beginning of the invasion. An ideal situation would be a cessation of NATO expansion and no bloodshed, but Communists have no real control over that.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        nor is it to “de-Nazify” Ukraine

        I think they do want to do this, since the Nazis are extremely hostile to Russia, so it’s crushing the opposition. Obviously this is pretty different from the historical de-Nazification efforts whose corpse Putin cynically puppets as cover for his actions.

        If there are meaningful factions of Greater Russia Nazis in Ukraine, he’d obviously be fine with those as he is fine with them in Russia.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Sure, there is some element to that, but the mover and pusher is a removal of threats, not out of any anti-fascist dedication, hence why like you said Putin is fine with “Greater Russia” Nazis.