Crossposting here as I consider X a threat to both privacy and freedom

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If you don’t censor hate speech and allow malicious propaganda to be the default, is there really any value in letting it be accessible?

    The problem really is that the lenders of X’s debt probably have a significant influence and have a vested interest in recouping their money.

    • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t believe there is any value in X. In fact I’d say it has negative value. However, granting the UE power and legitimacy to censor any website for political reason also has a negative value, and I’m not certain which is lower.