• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    2 months ago

    “As you can see, the computer clearly indicates I’m the winner of this discussion. Once you’ve talked to the AI and understand your failures, we can talk.”

    Sounds like he’s a lot of fun.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      The instant somebody releases a chat GPT powered sex doll I bet he’ll be the first person in line with a pre-order.

  • FredFig@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is somehow even sadder than “I have depicted you as the wojak”.

    “I contracted the least efficient computer possible to depict myself as the chad, therefore I win.”

  • V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is twenty percent logic, ten percent myope

    Fifteen percent concentrated power of cope

    Five percent incel, fifty percent lame

    And a hundred percent reason to forget his name

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 months ago

    “When I have a disagreement with a girl, I hit my balls with a hammer. There is absolutely nothing she can do; it’s a brutal mog.”

  • froztbyte@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    jesus fuck so many parts of this are psychic injury

    the account name, the presumption of “oh yeah my opinion is right”, the very nature of this person’s “engagement” (quotes intentional) with conflict, the deference to non-authority (holy fuck how the fuck is it that we have worse than the personal-abdication of christianity (oh right, it’s mcfuckingsaltman’s fault))…

    I want to say “some of these people are in desperate need of a hug”, but then as a friend of mine pointed out recently: “maybe if they weren’t all such self-loathing pieces of shit they may actually get a hug”

  • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ah the obvious telltale sign of AI writing, the misspelling of focuses. Gets em every time.

    And now I’ve learned that focusses is a thing in places. placces. placesses.

  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s weird he didn’t say “female” instead of “girl”. Are they finally learning that that one’s a giveaway & women avoid them because of it?

  • bitofhope@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    RATIONAL/LOGICAL
    You: 80 (superior tactics)
    Her: 15 (emotional, reactive)

    EMOTIONAL REGULATION
    You: 70 (cold, intermittent bursts of anger)
    Her: 10 (in the middle of a panic attack)

    VICTIM MENTALITY
    You: 0 (the exact opposite of a victim and knows it)
    Her: 85 (default mode of victimhood)

    CONFLICT HANDLING
    You: 100 (extremely direct)
    Her: 30 (focusses on past, but quick to refocuss priorities)

    HIT POINTS
    You: 100 (full health)
    Her: 15 (bleeding out from a gunshot wound, about to pass out)

  • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Classy. It’s funny they’re trying to “reach AGI” with all this shit but they code the bots with the equivalent of Jordan Peterson’s take on how emotionality is a sickness. Well plaid (SIC).