“After extensive consultation, discussion, and deliberation, the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force has decided to encourage American Muslims to vote for any presidential candidate of their choosing who supports a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and a US arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as candidates Dr Jill Stein, Dr Cornel West or Chase Oliver,” read the statement, obtained by Middle East Eye.

The statement was written by the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, an umbrella group formed this year that consists of a number of prominent Muslim organisations including the political arms of Americans for Justice in Palestine (AJP), Cair, and the US Council of Muslim Organizations.

“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by US laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” the statement read.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Organize with my fellow leftists and continue to push for Revolution, which we know factually works, rather than trying to push for reform, which we know factually doesn’t work.

    I’ll probably end up voting for Claudia De La Crúz of PSL.

    • jaaake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m all for revolution. It’s not going to happen at the scale needed before the upcoming presidential election. Depending on where you live, that vote is either going to do nothing, or make a revolution more likely to be stomped out by authoritarianism before it can reach the critical mass needed to enact change.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nope, it likely won’t happen before the election. However, I don’t see why you think the DNC wouldn’t collaborate with the GOP to stomp out Revolution equally, both serve the United States.

        • jaaake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Your choices for the presidential election are DNC and GOP. If you think that those options are completely equivocal, I don’t think this conversation is worth continuing.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Yep, and both will crush protestors and support genocide, so Leftists need to organize to protect themselves regardless.

                • jaaake@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I don’t understand why you can’t recognize that you can do both. Voting to mitigate as much damage as possible doesn’t mean DON’T organize and protect yourself. Casting a vote for the party that is less likely to trample individual rights in less arenas is more effective than wasting a vote on something that has a net negative effect. Voting is the absolute minimum and takes near zero time and effort and has potential (depending on where you live) to affect millions of lives.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Casting a vote for the party that is less likely to trample individual rights in less arenas is more effective than wasting a vote on something that has a net negative effect.

                    That party is PSL, the DNC and GOP are far more similar than different.

                    You also haven’t proven this “net negative effect” of increasing exposure for PSL.