• Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think the bit of context here that is lacking is why she felt the need to drop to the floor in the first place. Was she hurt? Dizzy? Pain medication kick in? Did he point his gun at her and she reflexively dropped? The pot didn’t go with her; it was still on the sink. From the cops’ vantage point he would’ve likely seen that.

    Beyond that, she’s the victim. Granted, police should use due diligence when responding to calls, but taking the stance that anyone is an adversary leads to guns being drawn and people being beaten waaay too early in the interaction and with little provocation. Suspicion of all leads to paranoid responses, and we see the fruits of that in this and other encounters.

    I’f be curious to know which you see as being more important here - the cops’ life or the civilians? Just trying to understand the frame of reference.

    • Balex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope, she still had the pot in her hands up until the point he shoots her. You can even see steam coming off the ground after she gets shot.

      I don’t think either of their lives are more or less important than the others, but I do think the officer has the full responsibility for how that situation plays out.

      I just hate the dishonesty about the situation, it makes your criticism look weaker. You can 100% criticize the cop without lying about the facts.

      • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        To clarify, what were the previous posters being dishonest about? The threat of the boiling water? If it’s that, I would conjecture that the cop mishandling the situation was what made the threat even a little credible.

        If not that, can you give me more detail on what the others were being dishonest about?