• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was a Discord dumpster fire that was thankfully put out months ago.

    Because Vaxry didn’t like the public backlash, not because he had any moral problems with the conduct. In fact, he doesn’t mind genocide:

    • burghler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think he was trying to have a philosophical point here but took the headass approach to it.

      20 years ish old, living in Poland, and perma online does things to a man. Weird though to have a take like that when Polish people in particular were significant victims in Auschwitz

      • Ferk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        To his point: if not “discuss”, what is the correct approach against fascism? war and murder? dismiss it, try to “cancel it” without giving any arguments so it can continue to fester on its own and keep growing in opposition?

        To me, fascism is a stupid position that doesn’t make much sense, to the point that it falls on itself the moment you “discuss” it.

        I would have expected that it would be the fascists the ones unable/unwilling to discuss their position, since it’s the least rational one. So it’s certainly very jarring whenever I hear people jumping to defend against fascism while at the same time stopping in their tracks when it comes to discussing it. Even if those unable to reason might not be convinced by our arguments, anyone with reason would. Rejecting discussion does a disservice, because it does put off those willing to listen and strengthens those who didn’t really want an argument anyway.

        Like flat-earthers, they should be challenged with reason, with discussion. Not dismissed as if it were true that there’s a huge conspiracy against them. Whether they listen or not to that reason, dehumanizing them and rejecting civil and rational discourse would play in favor of their movement.

        Stating “genocide is bad” should NOT be a statement of faith. Faith is the shakiest of the grounds, if we are unable to articulate the specific reasons that make genocide be bad, then we are condemned to see it repeat itself. So, I’d argue it’s for the sake of the victims in Auschwitz that antifascism should not be turned into a religion, but into a solid and rational position that’s not distorted nor used willy-nilly.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Aw, man. I think Vaxry’s got entrapped here.

      He is saying that if nothing can sway you from an opinion, then it is a belief, including being 100% opposed to genocide.

      (Please note: I don’t side with genocide!!! But I understand his point. Read on.)

      I think he’s the positions armchair arguing type, not necessarily the evil type.

      I can totally see him say “If a group of people’s solely reason to exist is to exterminate the rest of the human race, if that’s all they think about, if all they do is to accomplish that - induce terror, kill babies, spew propaganda, castrate humans of all races; then it’s safe to say that that group of people should not exist and it should be exterminated.”

      That’s an extremely wild scenario, of course! But I think that’s what this guy is saying. We may find genocide in general heinous, but he won’t say that all genocides are bad because of thought examples like the above one.

      Then the other party takes that personally, and extrapolates that Vaxry is in favor of exterminating all trans people - something he didn’t say or mean.

      My two cents.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        That discussion didn’t come out of the blue, though. It was in the aftermath of behavior on his Discord where his position was “I didn’t say the things and I can’t moderate”. Also, as a person of Polish descent who follows Polish politics probably a bit closer than the average person, I see a pattern of PiS party ideology / common behavior by PiS supporters of being at the far right and the claiming ignorance when their behavior leads to bad press.