Would be funny if Winamp gets a second life ~20 later.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    It doesn’t say what license they are going to use, so it may not be open source. The wording is very weaselly.

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is news from September and linked blog post from December. Nothing happened.

      • Xabis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Winamp has announced that on 24 September 2024, the application’s source code will be open to developers worldwide.

        The date is given on the page, which hasn’t lapsed yet.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re probably spending intervening 10 months cleaning all the embarrassing comments out of the code before the initial commit.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      IMHO, it sounds like it’ll be “Source Available.” Especially

      Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version.

      • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Would this allow a fork under a different name or would it have to be rewritten, replacing all original code, like Unix?

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If they chose an open source license, a fork under a different name would be possible (else it’s not open source).

          Their wording is ambiguous, so maybe they only talk about keeping the name/trademark to themselves, which is definitely a good choice.

          It’s also not clear if they accept contributions, but they’ll likely keep deciding what features should get added or not.

          At least that’s how I understand it.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I’m correct Justin sold WinAmp and then created Reaper AKA the best DAW ever made.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    With this initiative to open the source code,

    The wording is quite evasive. They didn’t say directly “With this initiative to open source” but “to open the source code.” They do however mentioned collaboration and contribution.

    I’m quite confused what license they would use.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My only windows machine left still runs Winamp. It may be old, but at least for playing my offline library, I really don’t know what they could possibly change. For everything else, I wouldn’t use Winamp anyway.