InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 6 months agoFound this wondering townlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up160arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up157arrow-down1imageFound this wondering townlemmy.worldInternetCitizen2@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square41fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregila@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoThey’d still resolve via DNS to an address in ASCII though, right? Wouldn’t that only be an issue if ICANN didn’t have a monopoly on DNS registration? i.e what we already depend on for a semblance of convenience without totally compromising opsec
minus-squareqaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 months agoIt utilizes punycode under the hood. The actual DNS entries still use ASCII.
They’d still resolve via DNS to an address in ASCII though, right? Wouldn’t that only be an issue if ICANN didn’t have a monopoly on DNS registration? i.e what we already depend on for a semblance of convenience without totally compromising opsec
It utilizes punycode under the hood. The actual DNS entries still use ASCII.