WATCH NEXT:Why Russian History Repeats itself (Putin and his hero Alexander III)https://youtu.be/bWJjrXVkFBAWhy Losing Crimea May Destroy Putinhttps:/youtu.b...
How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn’t the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?
How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn’t the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?
What
Don’t play innocent, it’s you who’s claiming to obviously not be a banana. I’m asking: Isn’t that denial suspiciously specific?
I think you’re confused… the video author is Vlad, he didn’t mean Putin…
That goes without saying, pretty much all undercover bananas, and not only those, are fans of Vlad.
I’m not claiming anything, obviously not.
Exactly what one would expect a banana to say in this situation.
🚫🍌