• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 months ago

    If anyone’s curious, it looks like you “hold the brake and swipe up” on a touchscreen area to go in drive, and “hold the brake and swipe down” to go into reverse.

    So yeah, it’s not a physical shifter, though it seems pretty intuitive and simple. BUT if you’re in reverse and try to swipe up to drive(like you’d do during a 3 point turn) , you have no feedback aside from looking at the screen to let you know it actually registered your shift.

    IMO this is another idiotic implementation at going cheap on physical controls or “being high tech fancy” that shouldn’t exist. It’s dumb to not have important functions give physical feedback while driving. I’m not laying most of the blame on tesla for this. It still sounds like she’s the one who really screwed herself, but I’d all but guarantee there’s going to be a lawsuit for this one, and rightly so. Fuck all this touch control crap in cars. It’s lousy enough just on the radios.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t forget the fancy electric door handles that stop working when you back into a pond.

      There are emergency override handles, but not everyone knows where they are or how to use them, so they’re not all that useful in an emergency.

      These deadly features are purely cosmetic, so I would lay a decent amount of blame is on tesla

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Stupid cosmetic designs have been an issue for a long time. There was a theater fire in Chicago in the early 1900’s where a bunch of people died because they couldn’t figure out how to use the fancy door handles while panicking and being crushed by everyone trying to get out. That’s the reason why exit doors on buildings with a high occupancy are now required to swing out, and have those pushbar locks that allow the door to open even if you’re just falling on it.

        If it’s possible that someone will need to use something while panicking, it needs to be as simple, intuitive, and failproof as possible

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Wanted to chime in and clarify, the major issue there is you cannot operate a door handle in a crush, no matter how much of your senses you have. Can’t use a door handle if you can’t use your arms. Am drunk on the internet and hope this isn’t interpreted as a hostile reply.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If it’s possible

          It’s always “possible”. In fact, it’s inevitable that an accident or emergency will happen. They happen every day. It’s clearly Tesla’s fault for having terrible controls but what else is new?

          That’s why we have dedicated first responders instead of just fire hoses everywhere. Many fires can be stopped with just some baking soda or a wet towel, but non-professionals can’t be trusted to act rationally in that situation.

        • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It wasn’t that they didn’t know how to use the door handles. It was that the doors opened inward.

          There were also ornamental doors that were an issue, but those weren’t actually doors, so it wasn’t that the victims couldn’t figure out how to use the handles, it’s that the “doors” weren’t really doors. They were walls.

      • MashedPotatoJeff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I had my way, regulations would require a physical connection for all door handles, and not just that a secondary physical release be available. I don’t know how you would go about finding injuries associated with each design as a layperson, but I bet there’s a death or two associated with each novel design.

        An old man roasted in his Cadillac XLR because the battery was dead and he didn’t know where the secondary release was. I think it’s under the seat on that car. I don’t care how cool that electronic door release was, or if the old man was negligent in not knowing his exits; it wasn’t worth his life.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          And let’s not forget that there are people who have flexibility issues that can’t reach under their seat in an emergency.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is why I liked driving the newer Army vehicles or well cared for Humvees. Everything was labeled. Anything important to not hit accidentally had a safety cover. And anything not obvious like an out of sight fire extinguisher has a high visibility sign pointing to it from your normal field of view.

          Fuck fashion, give me cars that are comfortable and safe.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I love how they made the emergency door release a multi step process, which on some models recommended a flat head screwdriver or in others only is for the front doors.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The front driver and passenger emergency handles are so intuitively placed that every Tesla owner has to warn all their passengers not to use them.

        The back is another story entirely if they even have them, but the front are fine.

        Edit: I will grant people might forget after not using them for years in a moment of panic. But they know.

      • anivia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        These deadly features are purely cosmetic

        No, electronic door handles are not cosmetic, they save a lot more lives than than they kill by people drowning or burning alive in their car because they are too stupid to read their cars manual.

        Since you apparently do not know this, the purpose of electronic door handles is for the car to be able to lock you out from opening the door if there is a car or bicycle approaching from behind in your blind spot. That’s why you only see them in cars with blind spot radars

        That being said, Teslas design is still terrible. In Audis the electronic door handle doubles up as the mechanical emergency door handle, you just need to pull on it harder than normal and it will engage the manual mechanism

        • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          they save a lot more lives than than they kill

          Do they? Can you provide any examples?

          the purpose of electronic door handles is for the car to be able to lock you out from opening the door if there is a car or bicycle approaching from behind in your blind spot.

          Seems like they created a lot of unnecessary risk to alleviate a relatively minor problem.

    • qwertilliopasd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      That is the worst idea ever. When I drove a snow plow I would shift from forward to reverse and back hundreds of times a storm. Without taking my eyes off my surroundings.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      But bro, you’ll save like $0.87 per car by not including a physical gearshifter. Won’t anyone think of the poor shareholders footing that bill.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Anton Yelchin was also done in by a not too dissimilar feature. The gear shift of his vehicle returned to a “neutral position” after shifting so unless you looked at the letter indicator you may not realize what gear you’re in.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I have the same annoyance with my prius. It’s a physical shifter you move, but it electronically shifts and the shifter always goes back to the same spot. If I try shifting in a hurry it won’t register every so often.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      How’s that any different?

      • My current Tesla has a stalk to click up/down to go into reverse/drive, but I always verify before taking my foot off the brake
      • my Subaru had a physical shifter on the console to move forward or back to a specific selection , but I always verified by taking my foot off the brake
      • I used to have a Pontiac with a shifter stalk on the steering wheel that I move to a specific selection, but I always verified before taking my foot off the brake
  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    When your Tesla is on fire, or sinking, you can play a fun little game called “Find the manual door release”

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is, you just have to find it while the car sinks or the flames spread. It’s not the normal button that a user might be accustomed to pushing to get out so they might not know where it is and finding it in time might be the difference between life and death. For front doors it’s usually a lever somewhere but in some model Ys and the cybertruck the rear door release is hidden. under a mat in the door recess.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I find it hard to talk badly of anyone who had just died, whether or not they were related to Mitch McConnell. That was a horrible way to go.

    But, if it turns out the Tesla design was at fault, then we may be watching one of the few families who have enough resources to challenge Elon Musk get medieval on his ass. Which would be fun to watch, even if did take a tragedy to start all off.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Their family is not a “loving family” that normal people would imagine. These are conservatives who lack the capacity for empathy and do not feel kindness or love for one another. Their relationships are transactional.

      If they sue, it will only be because they see an opportunity for profit. Not because they want to prevent this from happening to anyone else.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        My family and most people I know are poor, and this is also how they function. Even the “side” pieces.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If it’s about money for them, they may see a payday incoming. At the very least, the insurance company that had a life insurance policy out on her might have a thing or two to say to Muskrat. I cannot imagine how much money they are going to be paying out.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m really torn between hoping the lawsuit payout is very high vs. not wanting the McConnell crime family to become even richer.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I disagree, it’s important to note that Conservatives love their families, too. They are not inhuman.

        And their love of their family can, for some, feed into their racism. Their families are successful and they may attribute that to genetics. People with inferior genetics can’t really help themselves, can they? They need a ruling class to make the important decisions for them.

        You’re right though, if they sue it won’t be to prevent this from happening to anyone else. It will be for revenge and punishment. Profit is a side motive here. They might pour an excessive amount into any lawsuit just for revenge.

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The level of glee here over a death is kind of appalling. Yeah, she was a billionaire, so was Steve Jobs. Related by marriage to Mitch does not make her responsible for Mitch’s garbage decisions. I’m sure she has family and friends who are devastated. I had not heard anything about her existence before this, but even if she’s a bad person she’s still a human and drowning is an awful way to die.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mitch’s sister in law died in a Tesla.

    Mitch Endorses Trump.

    Trump meets with Elon Musk.

    Do I have the timeline correct?

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      theoretically it should be possible to remotely control a tesla. I’m not saying its murder, but did anyone check?

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The great thing about software is it can be programmed to leave no evidence.

        “The log says self driving was off”

        “The log says the computer controlled doors were unlocked”

        Who wrote that log? Yeah.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is one of the reasons I am hesitant to get any “digital car”. I’ve read that government has backdoors to turn off engine or otherwise control cars.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          The real threat is foreign bad actors. There’s a global database that maps all VINs.

          How many Americans have connected cars? How many are in garages? How many will not smell the exhaust before it kills them when every car in the country is started one night?

          That’s WMD

          Source: I used to meet with the CISOs of all the global auto manufacturers annually. If you’re a light sleeper, don’t work in infosec.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            interesting idea for what really amounts to a terrorist attack. any others? i figure you may have some other cool ones

            personally, i’m more scared of our government in most cases. of course, foreign bad actors can and will do damage but over the long term the government, should it morph into something a bit more authoritarian than it is today, would have much more incentive and capability to do harmful things

            i remember there was some leak nearly a decade ago already that showed NSA can access all smart TVs. some TVs even have microphones so that they can listen to what’s going on in your living room. Makes you wonder if Orwell was a time traveler

            • blazeknave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I was a pretty big punk rock anarchist conspiracy theorist from my preteens through my early 20s. Now I work in the field. IMHO the US’ version (not the GOP’s) of world order, is the least scary. And with these psychos threatening murder and shit, the SOTU rebuttal about knee deep in blood… I’ve come to accept whatever dumb shit I or anyone I know is doing online, the govt doesn’t give a shit. But as a FOSS nerd and EFF-donating privacy advocate, I feel you. My real fear is bad actors leveraging and extorting people.

              As far as other examples… Just imagine every single thing you know is connected, is under attack 100% of every day in every direction. Way before the current tension, the US has been in cyber warfare with Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, etc. Right now they’re all trying to steal each other’s classified data. Some off the books guys might be actively trying to meltdown a nuclear plant. The world is your oyster. Whatever you can imagine, it’s happening. That’s why those Industry meetups I attended exist. Lookup ISAC. Automotive, finance, healthcare, manufacturing… Every vertical has an org where the security leadership exchanges best practices in spite of corporate competition, “bc the bad guys are sharing tips, so why shouldn’t we?”

              I think you’re talking about PRISM? Iirc they had a pipe directly from the Bell/At&t Telco building at the Brooklyn bridge but that could have been hearsay. But I’d argue he was just a historian, not a futurist. It’s always been the same. Just different tools.

  • Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Annnnnd I’m becoming a worse person cuz this put a smile on my face. Honestly it’s partially her fault for trusting Elon’s company.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Billionaire Kryptonite recipe.

    One part billionaire, one part Tesla, two parts billionaire tears. Shake well and douse with copious volumes of lake water. Chef’s kiss

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Imagine the crazy conspiracy shit if this was how Musk forced McConnell to retire by forcing her Tesla into the water, or some other crazy reason.

  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is horrifying. A manual window breaking device that is part of the interior of the car should be standard by now. It wouldn’t be that difficult to design. This is not a Tesla exclusive problem.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I never actually thought about this, but you’re right. Wtf isn’t this a standard, and part of saftey scores?

      For some cars you can remove the head rest and use the metal prongs, but it’s still probably not as good as an actual purpose built punch.

    • Brekky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Doesn’t seem there’s a tool available for breaking laminated glass. Which is also terrifying but I do understand why the DOT mandated the switch.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wow, he referenced her death in his retirement statement, but I just assumed it was age related because… well… look at them.

    Always remember, if your car goes in the water, you CAN’T open your door until the pressure equalizes. You have pounds of water pushing against the door, keeping it closed.

    Mythbusters went over this… Undo your seat belt and let the water IN. When there’s enough water inside, open the door.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Shortly after Mythbusters did that bit. They were directly credited with saving a trucker’s life. He crashed into a lake. His window didn’t work but he had a manual roof vent, which he was able to open to equalize the pressure. He said he would have never done that if he hadn’t seen the episode because of how scary it was to watch the water pour into his cab.

      Spelling

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Adam Savage has said that that was the most terrifying myth they’ve tested, and I’m pretty sure even with all of their divers and support crew he thought he was going to die.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think part of it was the fact that they used an old smoker’s car. I remember him talking about the nicotine burning his eyes and all the smoke and nicotine clouded up the water making seeing anything even more difficult.

    • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a Tesla right? Those door handles are electric, so you need to hope the cars electrics hold and not short. Or you can find the emergency release in the door pocket.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        you can find the emergency release in the door pocket.

        Not without some training first. They are inexplicably hidden. I imagine Elon laughing aloud when he reads of people drowning in Teslas, frantically trying to figure out how to escape.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’ve heard they have some manual door latch backups? do you know if they’d be affected as well?

        • Bezier@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          If the backups aren’t the door handles themselves, where are they located, and how many owners and passengers know about them?

              • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Luckily there’s reinforced windows that can’t easily be broken either. I wonder if the EU models are the same because I have a hard time believing that this isn’t breaking several safety regulations. This whole thing is such an ironic and frankly idiotic freak accident.

        • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ah I was confusing the front and rear doors. From this video it looks like it’s in the door arm rests, while the rear door is burred in the rear door pocket under a flap. Both appear to operate the latch manually so no electricity required.

        • Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’re completely manual. There’s a manual door latch literally right below the button you’d press inside to open it.

          Pull that up & the door unlatches to open.

          They’re literally designed in for emergencies.

          It’s the same in the model 3, Y, & S.

          • AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I just watched the video above. I’d say it’s a criminally bad design, because the emergency open is completely hidden from the casual observer and completely blending in with the other colors and shapes of the armrest. This makes it useless in an emergency.

            There is a reason why Fire extinguishers, seatbelt release buttons, emergency exit signs, emergency brakes in trains etc. are all designed in bright, red stand-out colors with big letters on them.

    • skeptomatic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Helicopter Egress Training they actually have you keep your seat belt(s) on until the cabin is filled with water, pressure equalized, AND door/window opened. The reason is, to push a door or window open you need a solid “foundation” and if you’re unstrapped floating in water you may only push your body away.
      A road vehicle has a smaller cabin and more hand/foot holds, but I thought it worth mentioning.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the reason they mention it is, in a car full of water, it would be an easy thing to forget, then if you get the door open, you panic because you still can’t get out.

    • robdor@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Top gear also did this and their results were pretty much just get out of the car as soon as you know you’re going in the water.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes. There are three phases to going into the water. Getting out before pressure builds, waiting for pressure equalization or creating it, and getting out after pressure equalizes.

        There’s a lot of situations where you will not have time to get the door open, like busting a turn rail and flying into the water. Obviously if you’re going in slowly and can’t stop it, (Like a slick boat ramp pulling a truck in.), just get out early.

  • june@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh no

    Anyway, I’m going to Vegas later this week to get messy with my friends for my 40th. Anyone have any recommendations for places to hit?

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Remember, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Except for herpes. That shit’ll come back with you.”

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Stromboli at 4 kegs.

      Super sketch building and parking lot.

      Red vinyl booths and decor not updated since Elvis was a teenager truck driver.

      Bartenders who’ve seen the hard times.

      Open 24/7

      Drinking

      Smoking

      Gambling

      High likelihood of hepatitis A, B, C and as of yet unknown variants

      And the best fucking stromboli this side of the Gambino family

      http://www.fourkegs.com/

      Also, your first stop out of the Vegas airport should always be for early morning drinks at the Double Down Saloon. I’ll let you figure out that that gem of a property on your own.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why would you ever pay to drink in Vegas? Head immediately to the Rite Aid and get alcohol like everyone else. Or go to any sports betting section in a casino. Drinks are free.

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not entirely sure I said anything about paying for drinks in Vegas. I’ve never paid for a drink in either fine high class establishment I described.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I skimmed the headline too quickly when I saw “billionaire” and “panicked last call” then I thought she was somehow involved in insider trading for Tesla stock.