snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down120
arrow-up157arrow-down1imageWindows compatibility is insane!lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squaredustojnikhummer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoNo you can’t because the dependency doesn’t exit anymore.
minus-squareJohanno@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoThen compile it from the sources
minus-squaredustojnikhummer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down8·1 year agoYes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure
minus-squareReakDuck@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoWho tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try. On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.
minus-squareeltimablo@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoHave you heard to Good Word of our Lord and Savior, AppImage?
No you can’t because the dependency doesn’t exit anymore.
Then compile it from the sources
Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure
Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.
On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.
Have you heard to Good Word of our Lord and Savior, AppImage?