I’ve had decent luck with Zorin Lite on older laptops. But here’s a list of others to try: https://www.slant.co/topics/12543/~linux-distros-for-old-notebooks-laptops

It would be useful to share hardware specs so that we can really recommend something for it. You will get best results by trying out multiple distributions and get a feel. Generally, almost any linux will do, problem will be browser so saving as much ram for it would be useful.

First suggestion: get some used SSD for it if it does not have it already (even 64GB will do), second get more RAM if possible.

Depending on the user I would first go with Linux Mint XFCE, that is lightest easy to use distro I have found.

For someone more advanced/less expectations Crunchbang++ is very light.

If you have more than 4GB of RAM you can install most distros. If not, I’d list my specs, especially the RAM.

Also, IMO, it’s less the distro itself. It’s more what DE (desktop environment) you choose. The DE is a set of preograms that responsible for the graphical part (like the taskbar, icons, settings).

The distro only help to save you the time/effort changing DE.

Anyways, distros:

x32: Zorin Lite 32bit (little older), Puppy Linux, Bodhi Linux, antiX, Lubuntu, Xubuntu, PeppermintOS, MX Linux.

x64: ZorinOS Lite, Ubuntu MATE, PeppermintOS, Linux Lite.

DEs: LXDE, LXQt, XFCE.

KDE is light-ish (new versions only).

I’d recommend you to stay away from Gnome.

I hope you have ssd and maxed out ram. 15 years is Core2Duo right?

Try HaikuOS, KolibriOS and the third option could be Ubuntu or Kubuntu. I’m sure Gnome and Kde will run just fine, but lxqt is marketed as the ost lighweight Linux DE.

But try Haiku and Kolibri for real even they don’t run on Linux Kernel.

For anyone wondering on update on this. So I install Ubuntu. As you guys know, it is 64 bit only. I was 50/50 expecting it to fail. It installed fine. I checked the specs. Intel i3 2.2GHz 8GB and 64 bit architecture. I just couldn’t remember if it was Intel 64 bit or not. Anyway, it installed fine.

However, I did not like that I was forced to snapd. I tried to remove it, and played with Ubuntu a bit. After an hour so I came back to re-read comments on other suggested distros. In looked up install arch on YouTube. I saw that I could use archinstall so I did. Currently looking at what desktop environment I should use.

I’m not a Linux noob. I just didn’t know the Ubuntu requirements. And also, I’ve been comfortably been using Fedora in my main desktop. I just wanted something different on this old old laptop. Thank you all for the comments. And specially for the recommendation give.

I dropped my laptop (couple years old) and it is basically unusable. So, I’m looking to revive my really old laptop (15 year old).

For those asking specs. I think the hard drive has issues so I’m going to replace with ssd. The laptop came with windows 7 32 bit. So, because it came with windows 7 32 bit, the manufacturer says that it has max memory of 8GB. I know I putted 2X4GB sticks in it last time I used it which was 4 years ago. I’m not sure if the chipset supports 64 bit. Also, if I remember correctly, CPU was like first gen i3 with 1.8 or maybe just maybe 2.Something GHz and with like 3GHz turbo.

Thanks everyone. I might try Ubuntu, but most likely, I’ll go with Lubuntu, Xubuntu or Ubuntu with Mate. And, I will use it for some light coding and web surfing.

A lot of it will come down to what you’re running for a desktop environment and software. I’ve got an old laptop with a duel core 2Ghz (x86_64) processor and 2G of ram, and running Debian with XFCE it can do basic web browsing, video playing/streaming up to ~720p, game emulators, etc with the same snappiness as a normal computer.

Ubuntu is a bit bulkier than Debian and some other Debian derivatives, so if you go with Ubuntu you’d probably make sure to go with a more lightweight ‘flavor’ with a non-gnome desktop and remove anything you don’t need.

Alpine and Puppy Linux are two other super lightweight distros that also might be worth checking out (albeit Alpine being a little more advanced and Puppy Linux being a bit limited).

What’s your use case? Like, what are you planning/wanting to do on that computer? If you’re looking for web browser and music playback, virtually any distribution would work. I have a similarly-spec’ed laptop (a quite old unibody macbook) and have managed to do browser/music/ssh with it with no problems, running Debian + LXDE and NixOS + DWM. If you want the “standard desktop experience” then you should probably stay away from the primary Ubuntu distribution with Gnome, and instead go for one of the official spinoffs, like lubuntu or xubuntu. If using Ubuntu as your distribution of choice isn’t a hard requirement, you could also check out other distributions like POP!_OS or a Fedora spin with XFCE, LXDE, or LXQT.

If you want gaming, you might be out of luck unless you have a discrete GPU and limit yourself to fairly old games.

If you’re just starting with Linux I wouldn’t recommend some distributions because of the learning curve. Arch Linux and its derivatives like Manjaro are really appealing to some people but there’s a lot of extra necessary knowledge that could hinder your progress. Ditto Gentoo and Alpine.

I’ve been running Void on a dual core Atom with 1862mb of ram. It won’t play 1080p video but it will browse the web fine.

2 GHz dual-core processor or better, 4 GB system memory, 25 GB of free hard drive space (per official documentation)

The main Ubuntu flavor is pretty heavy since it uses GNOME, you are better off running Lubuntu, Xubuntu or Ubuntu Mate. For very low end hardware you could use something like antiX.