When confronted with basic questions on “60 Minutes,” the group appeared ill-prepared and stumped and alleged their critics were trying to “marginalize us.”

Since its founding in 2021, the conservative organization Moms for Liberty has billed itself as a champion for “parents’ rights,” pushing campaigns across the country to ban books and the use of pronouns in schools. Their crusade, as my colleague Kiera Butler has reported, often alleges that educators, specifically in public education, are out to “groom” and “indoctrinate” kids.

But what, exactly, does that mean? It doesn’t appear as though Moms for Liberty knows either.

In an interview with 60 Minutes host Scott Pelley that aired on Sunday night, the group’s two co-founders repeatedly struggled to explain their platform beyond empty talking points that have fueled the culture war in schools. They also failed to present facts to back up various claims.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Good on the interviewer for exposing these two as ignorant clowns. If they demand to be taken seriously they should have to provide serious evidence. As it stands they have trouble even articulating exactly what they’re angry about. If this group is serious about wanting to stop grooming, they should start protesting churches, not libraries. “In the average American congregation of 400 persons, with women representing, on average, 60% of the congregation, there are, on average of 7 women who have experienced clergy sexual misconduct.” And that’s from a Christian watchdog group.

    The outrage about indoctrinating children coming from within the echo chambers of homeschooling, religiously affiliated schools/camps, and and other child/youth groups is tragically ironic. I know, I grew up inside that system.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh, I think they can precisely articulate exactly what they’re angry about if you let them, but they know if they do that in public it’ll show just how crazy, hateful, ignorant, and bigoted they are. What they’re struggling with is how to articulate what they’re angry about in a way that doesn’t immediately expose them as a modern-day KKK for LGBT+ folk.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can’t spew hate towards black people. That’s racist. But hating an “urban youth” or “thug” is totes devoid of any racial bias.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      As best I’ve been able to suss out, living as I do in a very red state, “grooming” has simply been expanded out to encompass any activity that makes a kid feel like they don’t have to be a cis-het Christian to be a good person.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “Woke” is 100% just shorthand for “anything I don’t like or don’t understand”. The people are angry because society is progressing past their antiquated beliefs and fears. It’s not even that they want to maintain the world they were born in - they want to “return” to a mythologically perfect past that never existed.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Neither party will go after churches, because theyre consistantvoters who vote how their religious leader tells them to vote.