As far as I can tell this basically means that all apps must be approved by Apple to follow their “platform policies for security and privacy” even if publishing on a third party app store. They will also disable updating apps from third party app stores if you stay outside the EU for too long (even if you are a citizen of an EU country, with an Apple account set to the EU region).

The idea that preventing app updates is in line with their claims of protecting security is utterly absurd. “Never attibute to malice what can be explained with stupidity,” but Apple isn’t stupid.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It gets a bit more complicated than that when it comes to antitrust law.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Apple has less than 30% mobile maket share in the EU, antitrust laws usually kick in above 66%, and very rarely above 50%.

      There are other laws being worked on to combat shrinkflation, and others to curb all the tricks of removing features after the sale, but they’re not here yet, and it remains to be seen whether they’d apply.

      • Jramskov@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think that’s how to look at it. There’s clearly something less than optimal about having these huge gatekeepers (as I believe is the term used) and the EU is trying to limit their power.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Gatekeepers and the DMA, are not exactly antitrust laws; they are a series of regulations applied to entities providing a digital service to above roughly 10% of the EU population, no matter the market share, without provisions to break them up.

          I guess… you could call them “antitrust light”, sort of.