• thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are defending themselves for having a gun, probably because the feel guilty for having one at their core or feel like others will judge them for it

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or because the comment they directly replied to said “gun people” broadly and they took it to mean "owners"and not “ammosexuals”

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        or feel like others will judge them for it

        I can’t imagine why they would feel that way after reading

        gun people are the biggest bunch of frail cunts on this planet

        • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah I think there is a bit of a disconnect with gun people. Some people are purely about self defense, some people are just genuine enthusiasts, and then there is the group of people who like to pretend they are part of the first two groups but really seem to have a lust for blood - be it fear (someone rings the door bell, or mistakenly drives down the driveway), perceived persecution, political ideology or just downright racist shit.

          Antigun people seem to think everyone who likes guns is part of the last crazy group. It’s a bit hard to really tell who is who sometimes, but it’s definitely impossible to keep the guns out of the crazies hands.

    • Lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You said: ‘gun people are the biggest bunch of frail cunts’

      What about the people who physically can’t protect themselves? Are you going to call a rape victim who has a gun to protect themselves a frail cunt?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes, they have no business carrying a deadly weapon. I’m not minimizing the crime nor the impact on the victim, quite the contrary. Unless there’s a serious reason to expect recurrence and law enforcement is no help, you’re giving a traumatized untrained person a deadly weapon. You’re setting that victim up to murder an innocent person.

        How is this person any different than you hypothetical rape victim? I don’t know why he may have been living in fear, but having a deadly weapon just meant that a traumatized untrained person murdered an innocent person.

        • Lemmy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          1.) Do you expect all criminals to follow the law?

          2.) Are you assuming that every rape victim is crazy?

          3.) What about when law enforcement doesn’t show up in time?

          4.) How do you know they’re not 3D printing firearms?

          5.) What about when your government becomes tyrannical?

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago
            1. I assume innocent people far outnumber criminals

            2. I assume many rape victims, and many other people are traumatized. I assume they may act out of fear.

            3. I assume the likelihood of anyone defending themselves from an actual threat is very low, especially someone acting out of fear, especially someone untrained. They’re not likely to be making rational, responsible choices, nor able to reliably do what they intend. You’re just trading one problem for another

            4. I assume someone 3D printing a weapon is a stupid edge case. Very few people can do it, it’s unlikely to work well, more likely to injure the user. Most importantly no one is 3D printing a gun on impulse, emotion, fear

            5. protecting yourself from a tyrannical government is completely unrealistic, and you could argue already here. Governments will always have many orders of magnitude more resources than you, many more deadly weapons, and many more practiced killers. Most importantly we’re no longer in a time when most of the governments weapons are people bringing their own musket. It’s more important than ever to defend against a tyrannical government, but frightened people shooting anyone who turns around in their driveway or knocks on their door is not the way to do it.

            • Doof@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              You are unfortunately wrong about printed guns, they are way more common and are actually useable now.

            • Lemmy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              1.) That doesn’t really mean anything.

              2 & 3.) How do you know they didn’t receive help/treatment? Also, you can’t just assume that every person is the same, most people go out of their way to get proper training to use a firearm.

              4.) No, it’s gotten way easier, there are blueprints everywhere online freely available and guides on how to make 3D printed guns at home.

              5.) Why did the USA pull out of Afghanistan then? We have the best military in the world, yet we couldn’t beat the people who live in the desert that had basically nothing? Urbanization is a nightmare in any war. In the end, it doesn’t matter how many resources they have. You have to remember that people in the military have friends and family back home, there would be a lot of internal conflict. Also, If we leave the people defenseless, we’ll end up just like China and Russia.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They live a privileged life where nobody legitimately wants to seriously hurt or kill them, and they can trust law enforcement to protect them.

        Armed minorities are harder to oppress.