• QHC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Defending billionaires is an even more ammoral act than making a joke you don’t like, comrade.

    • skogens_ro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dislike seeing radicals joke about murdering their enemies. It dehumanises them which helps extremism takes hold.

      Of course that is the point of such jokes, but you shouldn’t be surprised if people call you out on it.

      • QHC@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, it absolutely is the point. I don’t think billionaires should exist, full stop. They have already dehumanized everyone but themselves, so IMO turnaround is completely fair in this situation. Starting with a very extreme demand like “eat the rich” gives us lots of room to negotiate their surrender.

        In general, I agree with you. But some cases are too important and cannot be reasoned with. As an otherwise avowed pacifist, I’d put “punch a Nazi in the face” on this list of acceptable moral hypocrisy, too.

        • skogens_ro@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re kidding yourself if you think it’s a negotiation tactic. When the revolution comes, such revisionism will get you executed by true believers.

          But at least you’re useful to them for the time being. Someone needs to radicalise the people who will carry out the purges.

          • QHC@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What revolution are you talking about? Billionaires already run the world, so the only possible option is to reverse that. In which case my position seems like it would appeal very nicely to the new ruling power.