Alabama is seeking to put a second inmate to death using nitrogen gas. The move comes a month after the state carried out the first execution using the controversial new method.

Alabama is seeking to put a second inmate to death using nitrogen gas, a move that comes a month after the state carried out the first execution using the controversial new method.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s office asked the state Supreme Court on Wednesday to set an execution date for Alan Eugene Miller. The state said Miller’s execution would be carried out using nitrogen. Miller, now 59, was convicted of killing three people during a pair of 1999 workplace shootings in suburban Birmingham.

“The State of Alabama is prepared to carry out the execution of Miller’s sentence by means of nitrogen hypoxia,” the attorney general’s office wrote, adding that Miller has been on death row since 2000 and that it is time to carry out his sentence.

  • fidodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    9 months ago

    Why don’t they apply anesthesia first? If I can get conked out so bad that I can’t remember getting my wisdom teeth removed wouldn’t that totally knock you out before being gassed?

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      15·
      9 months ago

      Pharmaceutical companies will not supply those kinds of drugs for executions, because they understandably don’t want their products associated with killing people.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      1·
      9 months ago

      If they can’t properly enact what should’ve been a painless execution, how do you expect them to properly anesthetise someone?

      • fidodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        Isn’t the danger of improperly applying anesthesia that you could kill someone?

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          2·
          9 months ago

          Of an overdose sure, but if they botch it the other way, there’s a good possibility the prisoner never properly goes under or they wake up during the execution, either way experiencing the full pain of death.

          That I’d figure is the worse of the results, and likely the one that’d happen given these guys seem to have a knack for torturous executions.

          • fidodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
            11·
            9 months ago

            Isn’t that still better than no anesthesia at all? Assuming that the execution method wasn’t changed to be worse.

            • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
              2·
              9 months ago

              Technically speaking yes, but that assumes they’re treated the same. It’s almost certain that if the executioners are under the illusion their anesthesia has worked, they’re not going to do things in such a way as to minimise pain.

              Prisons seem determined to turn executions into torture sessions - and while the need for capital punishment can be debated all day, we can all agree that the death is supposed to be the punishment, not the procedure.