• assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Loving that the only dude who posted valid legal precedent in the same jurisdiction is getting down voted.

    And then Lemmy users will complain how ass Reddit is for exactly this lmao.

    • Badabinski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I didn’t downvote those posts, but I did feel like the thread was aggressive when it didn’t need to be. I’d guess that a flippant/passive aggressive remark like “New to US civil law?” was (rightfully) upsetting to the user who clearly has an understanding of the law here. That user responded in kind and defended their original comment. However, they then kept responding to other users in a fairly aggressive fashion, even when those other users were communicating in alright way.

      I totally get it. I’d be pissed if, after posting a well reasoned and researched comment on Kubernetes, someone responded saying “new to container orchestration?” I try (and sometimes fail) to express the more vulnerable feelings underneath anger online after dealing with my anger in meatspace. I find it results in more productive conversations. It’s hard to do that, so I’m not casting aspersions. I think that’s probably why people downvoted in this case though. People try to suppress and avoid aggression and conflict because those things are uncomfortable and used to be precursors to actual physical danger. It’s just biology and emotions at work.