that aside, one of the connections I have to the US has kids and her kids actually experienced some isolation because the kids only had “cheap android” and thus couldn’t use iMessages which was what all the other kids pointedly used because teenagers are suckers for made up common identity bullshit. It was that one specific brand of baggies when I was young, now iit seems to be iPhones in some places.
This article is 5 years old and it would be a massive stretch to say it proves people buy iPhones in any appreciable number for iMessage. I get what you’re driving at but this is very indirect, dated, and just overall insufficient. It’s mainly about multitasking at the end of the day.
What tone? I was pulling your leg a little, as in “haha u old”, no sarcasm intended.
Regarding the sources: I just did a quick google and here is the most trustworthy source of business insider: https://www.businessinsider.com/gen-z-iphone-ownership-creates-culture-of-multitasking-2019-6
that aside, one of the connections I have to the US has kids and her kids actually experienced some isolation because the kids only had “cheap android” and thus couldn’t use iMessages which was what all the other kids pointedly used because teenagers are suckers for made up common identity bullshit. It was that one specific brand of baggies when I was young, now iit seems to be iPhones in some places.
This article is 5 years old and it would be a massive stretch to say it proves people buy iPhones in any appreciable number for iMessage. I get what you’re driving at but this is very indirect, dated, and just overall insufficient. It’s mainly about multitasking at the end of the day.
I guess I misread the tone, no worries.