• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Carry that thought. Then what?

    Bomber blows up the neighborhood and Joe bob did fuck all.

    To be clear, I’m not making light of swatting, and not accepting the culture of modern cops to go all tactical to every little thing. Injustices are happening, people are getting hurt.

    I personally want to live in a country where a bomb threat is treated with maximum seriousness.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Are you suggesting that unarmed negotiators don’t have an amazing success rate?

      They are public servants who volunteer to do a dangerous job. Considering the way they treat innocent people now, yeah I’d much rather hire competent people who are willing to do the job properly.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d love to see a source on that. I’ve never heard negotiators are particularly effective.

        “Amazing success rate” sounds like a 75% + de-escalation rate with the offender in custody and the bomb undetonated.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Nope. I don’t have numbers. But I have seen competent, compassionate people talk desperate people out of some dire situations without harm to anyone. We should always start there. Every single time.

          Cops on the other hand must be leashed.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I spoke to the tactical-happy nature of cops, and how that’s a serious issue. I pretty specifically constrained my area of discussion to bomb threats. I acknowledge that for other issues of less terroristic nature, a negotiator is great. (Wellness checks, domestic issues, substance issues, etc)

            Thanks for clarifying the anecdotal source though.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Crazy to see you get down voted for this.

      Not taking the threat seriously is exactly how Uvalde started.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “popular” sentiment is FULLY ACAB, dearm, negotiate, community activist.

        Life is not black and white. Sometimes a strong response is needed. I’m real fucking thankful police exist. Despite their massive failings.

        On the other hand there are many many many calls that don’t need an armed response, and a community negotiator is a better choice.

        Ultimately policing in north America needs massive restructuring. Unnecessary violence and injustice are happening everyday, especially to minorities.

        But the response to bomb threats is NOT the top of the list of changes.