The Apple Vision Pro is supposed to be the start of a new spatial computing revolution. After several days of testing, it’s clear that it’s the best headset ever made — which is the problem.

The Apple Vision Pro is supposed to be the start of a new spatial computing revolution. After several days of testing, it’s clear that it’s the best headset ever made — which is the problem.

  • Dmian@lemmy.worldEnglish
    392·
    10 months ago

    This is a first generation modern Apple product: expensive, flawed, lacking in features. I’ve been a long time Apple user, and if I had the money to buy something like this (I don’t), I would definitely avoid it, and wait for iteration 2 or 3 of it. The review is good, and highlight all the reasons why you should avoid buying this device, unless you wan to develop something for it. Guess we’ll only see YouTubers using it.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.socialOP
      242·
      10 months ago

      I think the biggest difference compared to all previous endeavors is that VR/AR devices are still this thing that collects dust in the corner even among the biggest enthusiasts.

      Most people had some form of portable music player (like Walkman) long before iPod was a thing.

      Every household had been equipped with phones long before Apple made iPhone. Cellphones were also a huge deal before iPhone.

      Watches are old as time (pun intended). Fitness trackers was also a big thing before Apple Watch.

      VR/AR? Most people don’t really care - despite multiple efforts from all the biggest tech companies. Is a more premium Oculus from Apple the solution? I guess time will tell, but I have doubts.

      • ramble81@lemm.eeEnglish
        11·
        10 months ago

        I also think they’re too big and bulky and haven’t found the right way to use them yet. When they can be integrated with glasses and can truly “augment” the world around you, that’s when they’ll pick up. Think of a party where you can automatically display the names of people and key bio info with them. Or a sporting game where you can pull up stats on players. Or navigation where it overlays arrows on the street. For now you just get “toss our window up in your field of view with these clunky goggles”

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          Isn’t that how google glass did it? It all sounds good in theory until you realize there is a looong road until it’s sleek and most people are not willing to use it in the awkward stage.

          • randomsnark@lemmy.mlEnglish
            2·
            10 months ago

            Google glass wasn’t AR though, it was just a display strapped to some glasses. It didn’t do 3D or head tracking or anything.

          • ramble81@lemm.eeEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            You’re right about the bulky phase. That’s really where they should be putting R&D. I think google glass had a better look, but all of these trials and missteps are ultimately what pushes it forward until there is a version that people really end up embracing.

            • randomsnark@lemmy.mlEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              Google glass wasn’t AR though, it was just a display strapped to some glasses. It didn’t do 3d or head tracking or anything.

      • Dmian@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        I don’t want to make predictions because I may, most probably, fail. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. Some products need more times than others, and some need to get something (and innovative app, for example) that justifies its existence.

        Time will tell. But still, it’s a first generation. Even the iPhone was not that good in its first generation. It’ll be interesting to see where this goes.