falcoignis@reddthat.com to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agouhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"?message-squaremessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1171arrow-down1message-squareuhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"?falcoignis@reddthat.com to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square201fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareunfazedbeaver@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 years agoAgree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
minus-squareamiuhle@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoI don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
minus-squareunfazedbeaver@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoIts not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard
Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
I don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
Its not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard