this country is so fucking cool

    • Xhieron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My money says this guy can’t even close his closet door anymore for all the skeletons.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, loves talking about his creepy spy app he and his son have on their phone that alerts the other if they visit naughty sites. So the writers of this proposal and all that vote for it would be happy to put the same program on their devices and computers, right? And tie that straight to a public feed we can all see? Great Great.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        See when I read this story it isn’t really that bad.

        They believe porn is bad and use the app to keep each other accountable. I don’t really have an issue with that. You do you.

        But when they start trying to enforce that view through the government it’s obviously not okay.

        • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Aside from it being creepy as hell to do that with your son (who probably didn’t have a say in the matter) this is a massive national security risk. Spyware on a Congress member’s phone? Not a great idea.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m imagining they have government issued phones and private phones. The government issued one for sure wouldn’t be allowed to have that shit on it.

            • GTKashi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That sounds reasonable and so it’s probably not even remotely close to what actually happens.

              • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The craziest thing about the Hillary Clinton private email server was not that she had it, but that her predecessors also used private email for government stuff as Secretary of State. Not a one-off, but the norm. Absolutely nuts.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.

    • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just let them pass it then search their browser history. You know the only reason they’re so concerned about it is they’re ball’s deep into it.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish I didn’t live in my COMMUNIST blue state where I can freely watch porn, read books, receive healthcare, feed hungry kids, breath clean air, turn around in driveways without getting shot and an abortion if I or my 10 year old daughter gets RAPED! I would MUCH rather live in a Red State where it’s only legal to shoot homeless people, go to church and breath fumes from the coal plant next door unless it gets too cold and I freeze to death!

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I agree with most of this, but don’t act like your healthcare is enough if you live in the US.

  • ryan213@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s take bets on who’s getting caught first! Drag queens or some god-fearing dude??

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t pretend for a second itll actually be enforced against the in group

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Taking bets on how long it takes (not if, but when) this man is hacked and found to be absorbed in the exact thing he’s trying to ban.

  • The Liver@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    FREEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOM 🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

    Ok then, every piece of sexual content I produce or consume is in political protest of this specific bill. That should hold up in court. Bust one for Dusty!

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait…

      You’re telling me that “Hentai is art” is a legal defense to this law, then?

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This should be turned around like what was done with Rick Santorum (Santorum. Def: "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.")

      Back at the beginning of Google-bombing, this was one of the early incredibly successful campaigns. This one wasn’t a neologism, but was another one that should be remembered just in case the ghoul Ann Coulter ever reemerges: I fucked Ann Coulter in the ass - hard.

      We just need a good one for Dusty Deevers.

      • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        How about - Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream out of the male sex organ

        It plays on the sound of diverge, and is absolutely a thing people would want a word for. It will grow naturally as groups of dudes laughingly complain about it. And I bet old skeever deever will hate it.

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They write articles about a bill some whacko proposed that has no chance of passing (and would be struck down in 5 minutes on first amendment grounds of it did) and pearl clutchers act like it’s the end of the world. Have you seen The People vs Larry Flint? That took place 60 years ago. This shit is nothing new.

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        a bill some whacko proposed that has no chance of passing

        A lot of the craziest shit in the lawbooks were things some whacko proposed “that has no chance of passing”.

        and would be struck down in 5 minutes on first amendment grounds of it did

        Current SCOTUS precedent is that the First Amendment does not protect porn if it contains “obscenity”. Specifically, any porn can be banned if it:

        1. Makes people uneasy
        2. Includes offensive sexual conduct - as decided by state law (?!?)
        3. “lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value”

        It’s called the Miller Test

        Notice the wording used in the proposed law. It’s already been pre-considered to have a solid chance of surviving a SCOTUS appeal. And the current SCOTUS wouldn’t dream of overriding Conservative jurisprudence.

        pearl clutchers act like it’s the end of the world

        Unfortunately, this is the type of anti-reactionary discussion that led to us being genuinely surprised when Roe v Wade got overturned. Clarence Thomas used the opportunity to signal that he would like to overturn Obergefell and Griswold as well. And he 100% has Barrett on his side and almost certainly has Kavanaugh. That means all he has to do is elbow Gorsuch and suck off Roberts and porn (and sex toys) could be illegal in some states, working towards a federal ban.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          led to us being genuinely surprised when Roe v Wade got overturned.

          Speak for yourself. I was not surprised when roe v wade was overturned, in fact I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did. The court invented a right that they wanted to be there and declared it had been there all along. That is not the judicial branch’s job. Roe v wade should have been replaced with a law, drafted by legislators, by like 1976. 50 years of Democrats dropped the ball on this and now innocent women are paying the price.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The court invented a right that they wanted to be there and declared it had been there all along

            …here we go again. I feel like people bring this up without understanding it all the time. The Fundamental Right to Privacy used in Roe comes from Griswold, and is (and was) an absolutely defensible interpretation of the Constitution. Much of our jurisprudence comes from Common Law and Reading Between the Lines (which is different from inventing a right from scratch). If you have a right to do A and a right to do B, there is absolutely an argument that you have a right to do A#.

            More importantly, DOBBS AGREED. They just said “There is a right to privacy, but fetuses are special. Bubye Roe”.

            Roe v wade should have been replaced with a law, drafted by legislators, by like 1976

            …which SCOTUS could easily decide is Federal overreach. A lot of people have argued with me (convincingly) that the best foundations of such a law are still not unassailable. The argument that the Constitution allows the federal government to protect abortion is just weaker than the argument that the Constitution inherently protects abortion.

            50 years of Democrats dropped the ball on this and now innocent women are paying the price

            Roe was decided by a largely pro-life conservative Judiciary, and the Right to Privacy was the weaker of two protections behind a clear 14th Amendment protection. Passing a law protecting abortion in 1976 is like passing a law protecting the right to Pray in your own home, or a law that forbids prosecutors from executing suspects during the arraignment. This is one of those things we really cannot justify blaming the Democrats for.

              • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Sorry I started with “here we go again”. In retrospect, it’s not fair to treat a person who makes an argument like they are the argument itself.

                It’s very common that I hear the “invented a right” complaint for Roe. There are a lot of valid criticisms for how jurisprudence works in America, but none of those valid criticisms started with Roe. Arguably they didn’t even fully start with Griswold, but the specific one in Roe did. People also often bring up Justice Ginsburg’s distaste for Roe. What they don’t understand (or conveniently forget) is that she was overridden in her 14th Amendment assertions by Justices that could be described as “Pro-life”, who came up with perhaps the most anti-choice interpretation of the Constitution as it was seen at that time. The “shaky ground” people talk about wasn’t Roe, but that Roe intentionally left a ton of room for states to add so-called “reasonable restrictions” on abortion, the kinds of restrictions the federal government would really struggle to justify limiting. If Oklahoma has a 3rd Trimester ban, get the abortion earlier or drive to a state without said ban. So long as they didn’t ban leaving the state to get an abortion, there’s not much for the federal government to write a law on.

    • ULS@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Gen z, millennials, and The Gays. /S.

      Edit: sorry I forgot the The Blacks, and Hunter Bidens Laptop.

  • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

    So you get get around it with a whiteboard in the background that has a math equation on it. Kinda like you can get around the swimsuit ban on twitch if you have an inflatable pool with water in it in the background.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe someone over there is watching porn for the story and is simply trying to ban porn without it. And I agree, I can’t take it seriously if I don’t understand my stepmoms motivation and background.

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re gonna sit here and act like the stepsisters opinion doesn’t even matter? WHAT IF SHE GETS STUCK?

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          … Im starting to understand the importance of the proposed legislation. Maybe we need a government agency to officially rank/score porn by the plot quality. Maybe a system like RottenTomatoes (RottenAssholes?).

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Okay, now we’re going to learn about the numbers with Lana and Kelly Roses. First Kelly will count with me to 10…1, 2,…7, 8,9 and 10!.. oh my God! I just wanna count so much! Oh my God, I’m gonna count! Img gonna count!

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is in response to all male Republicans feeling terribly inadequate after seeing Hunter Biden’s hog (thank you MTG!). I’m sure they all think the only way to please a woman is to have a large unit. lol.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What is this comment for? What is the end goal? Also, what the fuck do we have to gain from hunter politically? He’s not elected. It didn’t matter when they started crying about it and it doesn’t fucking matter now.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think Hunter matters in the slightest. That some of our federal officials are still bringing Hunter dong shots to put into the congressional record and display on poster boards is a thing worth noting and sharing awareness of.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a joke. Maybe take a break from social media and take a walk.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was being a little piss baby the other night. The overall sentiment I still stand by, but I shouldnt have spoke to you this way.