• X users are complaining about an influx of low-quality ads promoting crypto scams and AI “undressing” apps.
  • The decline in reputable advertisers on X has made the platform more reliant on less reputable ad buyers.
  • The exodus of advertisers, partially due to Elon Musk’s controversial behavior, has left X with a growing revenue gap.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/sbOxS

  • gullible@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You advertise to your audience. Ads targeting the perverse and the stupid seem perfectly suited to twitter.

    • Black Skinned Jew@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the far right wing christofascists start seeing CP AI generators adverts suddenly, it would fit their preferences so well.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    10 months ago

    404 Media report[ed] last month that ads promoting “semen stealing” were showing up on the site.

    Wait what now

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well he told advertisers to fuck off so they did.

    To me as an average Joe it seems pretty dumb to tell your advertisers to fuck off when they provide a big chunk of your income but hey, I’m not a stable genius billionaire so I just don’t get Elon’s 5D chess moves. Right?

    • Exosus@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s much more interesting to me is when Facebook and YouTube told advertiser’s to fuck off? Because it’s the exact same type of ads but people pretend they see Disney and coca cola ads on everything except twitter…

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m calling it now. Even if his aim was to not destroy Twitter from the inside, he will absolutely say that was his goal when it eventually happens.

    People like this never, pathologically, ever, ever admit making a mistake.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even if his aim was to not destroy Twitter from the inside, he will absolutely say that was his goal when it eventually happens.

      Could that open him up to lawsuits from investors?

        • Mikina@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I though Twitter is publicly traded and has stocks? That would mean that he definitely has a duty towards investors who bought the shares to lead the company in a responsible way, and if he claimed that he destroyed it on purpose, it should lead to a lawsuit from them. But I ain’t no lawyer, only vaguely remember hearing something like that. Or does he own 100% of the shares himself and is the sole investor?

          • efstajas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It used to be publicly traded, but it went private when he acquired it.

            Which doesn’t mean he doesn’t answer to any investors anymore, of course. He got quite a lot of assistance with that acquisition.

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s crazy, any time I open it up I see blatantly obvious rightwing trolls or even gore. My feed pre-Elon didn’t look like that, I mostly followed infosec people but they’ve all gone elsewhere and now it seems I’m being served content that baits me into arguing or converts me.

  • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “The fact that X has made it abundantly clear that it has no desire to create a brand-safe environment has only solidified our recommendations to move to growing platforms with better opportunities for organic discovery,” he added.

    This is how you say “fuck you too” in corporatespeak

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I would personally go with:

      “Some may say that Mr. Musk was a visionary, and further to the road map laid out by Mr. Musk during the Dealbook Summit, our organization is happy to assist with bringing said business forecast into reality.”

      • Past tense on visionary
      • brings up him telling companies to “fuck off”
      • rubs it in that his financial people have clearly told him that this is how Xitter goes belly-up, and that when he tries to fix it, he just makes it worse.
      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 months ago

        They never hurt you.

        This heavily depends from which geographical region you’re from. They were the champions of imperialist colonialism for a loooooong time.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hell, I’d broaden it to the whole world because the Romans popularized Christianity, which pretty much immediately kicked off millennia of religious conflict. Christians vs “pagans” (which wasn’t one single group), Christians vs Christians, Christians vs Jews, Christians vs Muslims, Christians vs all “pagans” in the world (and their history), Catholics vs Protestants, church vs science…

          Maybe Christianity would have risen without the Romans, but it wouldn’t have had such a powerful papacy without the Roman legacy. And as much as I hate religion, I have to admit it wasn’t all bad; if it weren’t for the clergy, even more Roman knowledge would have been lost and education in general through Europe would have been worse. Maybe. Islam did have Christianity beat for education and progression for a while, and the church did have a habit of condemning science that contradicted the idea that we were special in every single way.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes, they did give us that, that’s true

            And sanitation Yes, that too

            The aqueduct I’ll grant is one

            thing the Romans may have done

            And the roads, now they’re all new

            And the great wines too

            Well, apart from the wines and fermentation,

            And the canals for navigation

            Public health for all the nation

            Apart from those, which are a plus,

            what have the Romans ever done for us?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Since when do “high quality ads” exist? I mean, the mentioning of “low quality ads” implies that those others might actually exist.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m starting to think that telling your customers to “go fuck themselves” may not be a sound business decision.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    AI undressing apps you say? AI’s about to make that video of Elon telling advertisers to fuck off a lot more surprising.

    • nymwit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Oh, my God, that’s disgusting! Software that makes naked pics online? Where? Where did they post those?”

  • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I care just enough to say I don’t care.

    I was repeatedly called a GPT3 bot on Xitter. This was before it was even public.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The best part was, just to see what he would do, I wrote his username and the date and time on a napkin and took a picture of it- blacking out part of my face to limit the doxing- and he claimed it was photoshopped. You can’t win against crazy, but I was pretty amused.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hmm last time I tried to do that, all I was able to do was show the selection process that required it was flawed and got admin access anyways.

          Or maybe whoever was in the terminals was just fucking with me the whole time.

          Either way, I’m still not sure I’m a person. Maybe I’m just a meat automation.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nope. I’m calling it Twitter. If he says it’s okay to deadname trans people on his platform, I’m going to deadname his platform.

    • saintshenanigans@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I find it particularly funny to call it X(formerly twitter) every time I have to mention it.

      Also kind of love how Dubious X is as a name cause I always think it’s a porn site before my brain clicks

      • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

        The Organization X (Greek: Οργάνωσις Χ; commonly referred to simply as X (“Chi” in Greek), and members as Chites (Χίτες)) was a paramilitary right-wing anti-communist royalist organization set up in 1941 during the Axis occupation of Greece. Initially an anti-Axis resistance organization, it gradually shifted its focus towards anti-communism. In 1951, X was officially recognized as a National Organization of Internal Resistance by the Greek Ministry of National Defense. Following the end of the Axis occupation, it played an active role in the persecution of communists during the White Terror and various military operations of the Greek Civil War, most notably the Dekemvriana.

        to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about