The delivery driver was working at that time, why wasn’t the receptionist!?

edit: Thanks to everyone who’s pointed out that this is a scam - and who gave advice/or worried about me. I was half asleep this morning, it didn’t click (though I did notice that the url wasn’t evri - I’m too used to vendors passing me over to third party websites). It doesn’t help that the evri helpline is robots only. No bank details lost though.

    • fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Honestly, its not the cost of delivery. Its that the delivery driver is working at 1:43 am, and that a charge is levied for not being available at this time. Not everyone sleeps at night, but with no warning, I have to reschedule my life to be at my desk at 2am for something I bought? Even if this were delivered to a home address - ringing the doorbell at 2am is shitty.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I doubt they actually attempted the delivery at this time. I’ve had multiple evri drivers mark that they attempted delivery and no one was in when I have been there waiting for them to knock.

        Trash company, trash employees.

      • luk3th3dud3@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I understand my post was not confusing. I was questioning why you need to pay twice for a service…

        That the delivery was scheduled at that time is a whole other level. Crazy stuff!

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Simping for awful companies with awful business practices is one of the weirdest things to come out of the internet.

      • luk3th3dud3@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Maybe give me the benefit of doubt and don’t interpret things? I meant that the service was already paid for by the sender and now somebody has to pay again? Seems strange to me at least…