In recent years, China’s LGBTQ+ community has been swept up in the Chinese Communist party’s broader crackdown on civil society and freedom of expression. In May 2023, a well known LGBTQ+ advocacy group in Beijing announced it was closing due to “unavoidable” circumstances. Last February, two university students filed a lawsuit against the education ministry after they were punished for distributing rainbow flags on campus.

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Did you read the article beyond the first paragraph? ONE case was related to a ‘kidnapping’ accusation. The rest of the examples have been about systematic persecution of LGBT related parties

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes I did. Here’s a few quotes from that article.

      While China has a law against domestic violence, it fails to adequately protect victims, especially LGBTQ+ people, say advocates, with crimes often dismissed as family affairs

      And

      Li Tingting (left) and Teresa at their wedding reception in Beijing, China, July 2015. Li, 25, a prominent rights activist announced their marriage in an effort to push for LGBTQ rights in China

      As well as it gives several examples of abusive families who manipulate the law to attack those who help their children. Like the trans woman who tried to protect the run away trans woman.

      I said it’s not good. But it’s not the government pushing this. It straight says so in the article in the quotes I’m posting.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        As per the article, the reasons for the arrests are kidnapping

        As I pointed out, kidnapping is a side issue, and unrelated to the majority of the cases.

        this is not exactly an LGBTQ+ issue.

        But it’s not the government pushing this.

        From the article:

        In recent years, China’s LGBTQ+ community has been swept up in the Chinese Communist party’s broader crackdown on civil society and freedom of expression. In May 2023, a well known LGBTQ+ advocacy group in Beijing announced it was closing due to “unavoidable” circumstances. Last February, two university students filed a lawsuit against the education ministry after they were punished for distributing rainbow flags on campus.

        In 2021, the founder of another group, LGBT Rights Advocacy China, was detained and released on condition that he close the organisation, which shuttered shortly after. That year, dozens of social media accounts associated with university campus LGBTQ+ movements were also shut without warning. Shanghai Pride, the country’s longest-running celebration for sexual minorities, ended in 2020.

        How is this not directly caused by the govt, and ‘not exactly an LGBTQ+ issue’?

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’ve already talked about it. When China doesn’t know what to do they censor everyone. But there are still gay bars and gay pride has gone into dance clubs.

          Heres a guide on where to go.

          https://www.travelgay.com/beijing-gay-bars-and-clubs

          Heck, they censored one of their most popular videos games genshin impact because it was too sexy. They censor straight sex too. In fact you could argue if they didn’t censor gay pride it would be preferential treatment.

          Hell your quote literally says it.

          Chinese Communist party’s broader crackdown on civil society and freedom of expression.

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok, so it’s semantics.

            Look, if the LGBT population is being persecuted for being LGBT, that makes it an LGBT issue. If others are being affected as well, that means there are multiple, and broader issues, but that doesn’t make it any less an issue for the LGBT population. And it is very much being pushed by the govt.

            • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Everyone is getting prosecuted equally so no it’s not an LGBTQ issue anymore than breathing is an LGBTQ issue.

              • wahming@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                What is with that stance?

                ‘They’re being persecuted for being LGBT, but others are being persecuted as well for unrelated reasons, so it’s not an LGBT issue’.

                If you’re being persecuted for being LGBT, it’s an LGBT issue! It doesn’t matter who else is being persecuted, it’s not mutually exclusive!

                • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Again it’s not about LGBTQ. It’s anything to do with dressing different or talking about sex. That’s why boy love films are so popular in China. They dress them in fancy traditional garb and have sexual tension but no kissing or sex. Hell some of them got so popular they got onto Netflix.

                  Here’s the main Chinese propaganda mouth piece promoting it.

                  https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1168331.shtml

                  • adderaline@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    right, but you do understand that these things are interrelated. not all anti-LGBT policies explicitly target only LGBT people. if you restrict dressing “differently” and talking about sex, the people who dress differently or have different kinds of sex (queer people) are systemically disadvantaged when compared to straight and cis people. and if there’s bigotry in your society, there’s no guarantee that these restrictive policies are going to be applied to everybody equally.

                    like, bathroom bills don’t have to mention trans people to target trans people exclusively, because very few other groups of people have the motivation to choose a bathroom that doesn’t align with their assigned sex at birth. if you restrict a behavior queer people are statistically highly likely to engage in, the fact that it could also impact other groups doesn’t make it not a queer issue.