Harvard University has been sued by Jewish students alleging it “has become a bastion of rampant anti-Jewish hatred and harassment”.
The complaint alleges the Ivy League school is violating the civil rights of its Jewish students by tolerating and enabling discrimination on its campus.
It comes just over a week after its president, Claudine Gay, resigned in part over her handling of antisemitism.
Harvard has not yet commented on the lawsuit.
The complaint, filed on Wednesday night, argues that Jewish students have been “subjected to a severe and pervasive antisemitic hostile educational environment” that have worsened since Hamas’s 7 October attack on Israel.
It claims that Harvard students and faculty members have harassed, intimidated and assaulted Jewish students in classrooms, in on-campus activities and on social media, including by calling for the murder of Jews and the destruction of Israel.
“What is most striking about all of this is Harvard’s abject failure and refusal to lift a finger to stop and deter this outrageous antisemitic conduct and penalize the students and faculty who perpetrate it,” the complaint states.
The claimants - a student at Harvard Divinity School and a group called Students Against Antisemitism, which include students at Harvard’s law and public health schools - allege that antisemitism on campus “manifests itself in a double standard”.
Harvard, they say, “selectively enforces its policies to avoid protecting Jewish students from harassment, hires professors who support anti-Jewish violence and spread antisemitic propaganda, and ignores Jewish students’ pleas for protection”, while disciplining those who engage in racism, transphobia and other forms of discrimination.
The complaint seeks monetary damages and an injunction to stop Harvard’s alleged violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars those who receive federal funds from allowing discrimination based on race.
The court filing was made by the Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm, which has launched similar lawsuits at New York University and the University of Pennsylvania.
Harvard has been under fire in the months since the Hamas attack, with the US education department and the House of Representatives both opening investigations into its handling of antisemitism on campus.
Last week, Claudine Gay - the university’s first black president - resigned following criticisms of her response to anti-semitism on campus, and allegations that she plagiarised parts of her academic work. She faced a firestorm of criticism over her December testimony before Congress, in which she failed to explicitly say that calls for the genocide of Jews violated university policy.
I’ll reserve judgement until more information comes out, but this really strikes me as a group of lawyers and agitators latching on to the zeitgeist.
It’s really quite sad that the Israel simps have abused the idea of antisemitism to the point that when I see accusations of antisemitism, I genuinely have no idea if they’re taking about serious bigotry or if they’re talking about people saying it’s bad to murder civilians.
The picture that the BBC included in the article seems like it may be the latter.
No need to speculate; the allegations are linked in the article:
Harvard students and faculty harass, discriminate, and assault Jewish students—including on October 18, when a mob of protesters attacked a Jewish student, and the next day, when a mob trapped a group of Jewish students in a study room
Subjected to intense anti-Jewish vitriol, including from their own professors and Harvard administrators, Kestenbaum and other Jewish students, including SAA members, have been deprived of the ability and opportunity to fully participate in Harvard’s educational and other programs and have been placed at severe emotional and physical risk.
Moreover, over the past ten years, Harvard has instituted admissions policies that have severely reduced—by as much as sixty percent—the number of Jewish students, an enormous decline that evinces an intentional effort, much like Harvard’s quotas one hundred years ago, to exclude Jews.
when a mob of protesters attacked a Jewish student, and the next day, when a mob trapped a group of Jewish students in a study room
The important part here seems to be left out: did Harvard punish the students responsible for this? I find it hard to believe that they got away with this if they actually did it and we know who they are.
He showed up at a pro Palestinian protest to try and dox the students there. They asked him to leave. He ignored them and was then escorted out. People did not say nice things to him.
I’m not sure there was a lot to punish.
That’s still speculative; for it’s merely one side making allegations without demonstrating substantive evidence in front of a court.
I start d (slowly) reading this and… Is this how legal briefs are written? It seems like a reddit blog post. For instance in the examples section they write “SJp … is one of the most vitriolic antisemitic networks on college campuses. SJP was founded by the chairman of American Muslims for Palestine (“AMP”), the leadership of which overlaps with the leadership of organizations that have been shut down by federal authorities, whose assets were frozen by the U.S. Treasury Department, or that were found liable in civil actions for providing material support to Hamas. SJP receives funding and training from AMP as well as from universities. SJP and its affiliates sponsor antisemitic events, host antisemitic speakers…” All of which I’m reading expecting a citation somewhere… Anywhere. It seems like easily verifiable stuff. But there is none. Is this how legal briefs are written?
Removed by mod
Now this is definitely antisemitism.
Being anti Israel is just not the same as being antisemitic. I’m not sure why that is such a hard thing for people to understand. Israel and Judaism are different things.
It’s because it makes it so much harder to be critical of Isreal if they can continue having anything labeled as antisemitic.
deleted by creator
With the information about the organzied harassment campaign that is openly available, I feel confident in judging that group as agitators and lawyers that terrorize human rights advocates.
What constitutes “the destruction of Israel”?
Nuking Israel because it’s primarily Jewish? Yes fuck that, that’s anti-semitism.
Israel as a purely Jewish ethnostate? Fuck that too, non-Jews live there and everyone is human. Netanyahu’s comments on “Israel solely for Jews” is fucking stupid and he clearly learned nothing from the 20th century German attempt at an ethnostate.
It’s unfortunate that entities such as the ADL have intentionally (and openly) blurred the line between antisemitism and criticism of Israel, and the news just regurgitates whatever they tell them.
Is antisemitism up? Yes.
Is it particularly bad at universities? Probably.
Is it up by 5000000%? (I don’t know the actual number, but the ADL likes to throw a big % out there.) No.
26% of Israelis are not Jewish, and all citizens are legally entitled to the same rights.
all citizens are legally entitled to the same rights
It’s worth pointing out that, in general and throughout history, citizenship is something that separates the privileged from the unprivileged. The in-group from the outsider. The masters and the slaves.
Touting the rights of citizens, therefore, does not necessarily rebut the parent comment’s criticism.
Not sure what you mean. Are there countries that guarantee equal rights to non-citizens?
No. And that’s quite my point.
I’m still not sure of your point. Israel is not an ethnostate. 26% of Israeli citizens are of minority ethnicities. Every person has the same legal rights.
OK.
No they’re not. Jewish Israelis have Jewish ancestry, which entitles them to more rights, and Palestinians are explicitly signaled as exceptions to a number of laws (see: Palestinian spouses of Israeli citizens can’t be naturalized).
Well the argument goes that Saudi Arabia exists as a Muslim ethnostate, so why can’t Israel exist for the same reason.
Edit: not my argument.
Is anyone arguing that Saudi Arabia should be?
Yes, Israelis.
Well, at least they’re consistent.
They’re only consistent for their own benefit.
Ralph Waldo Emerson:
" A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines."
His point was that only small-minded men refused to rethink their prior beliefs.
Saudi Arabia should not be allowed to exist as a Muslim ethnostate, though. Their human rights abuses against those that aren’t part of their specific ethnicity and religious sect are pure evil.
“They get to do evil, so I should too” is a very bad argument that is not made by people who aren’t evil.
Saudi Arabia isn’t a Muslim ethnostate. It’s a state whose citizens happen to be almost 100% Muslim because this is Saudi Arabia of course they are. This isn’t defense of their treatment of
slavesforeign workers or anything of the sort, that’s just pure evil.
“It comes just over a week after its president, Claudine Gay, resigned in part over her handling of antisemitism.”
Is this just blatant misinformation or am I out of the loop? I was under the impression that she resigned over plagiarism while some people online criticized her for “antisemitism”. I haven’t read anything about antisemitism being a primary cause from any publication but this one.
As with anything you read about Israel, the facts are always distorted just slightly enough to completely change the message without flat out lying. It’s not just you, there’s a major funk around any Israel based news stories coming out of the mainstream media.
“selectively enforces its policies to avoid protecting Jewish students from harassment, hires professors who support anti-Jewish violence and spread antisemitic propaganda, and ignores Jewish students’ pleas for protection”
The problem with this statement is it is completely subjective and not at all objective. The first one is reasonable if Jewish students are being verbally harassed walking through campus with complaints being ignored. That might very well be happening. However, the other ones sound a whole lot like, “you hired professors who don’t 100% support Israel no matter what the country does.” One person’s “spread antisemitic propaganda” is another person’s “shared a story from a reputable news source that didn’t show 100% support for Israel.”
If you cry
antisemitismwolf enough times, sooner or later people will stop believing you.Without having seen the specific kind of “hatred and harassment” they’re talking about, I can’t form a valid opinion. I wonder, though, if people are interpreting fair criticism of the Israeli government as “antisemitism”. Fair criticism and antisemitism are two very different things, but I often see them confused.
Similarly, I wonder if people are trying to disguise hateful antisemitism as “fair criticism” when there’s nothing fair or reasonable about it.
As always, it will be difficult to protect freedom of speech while preventing and punishing hate speech.
This reminds me of this older video:
Removed by mod
Not all Jews are pro-Israel, pro-genocide, pro-harassment, etc (take your pick). This cuts both ways. Anyone saying that criticizing Israel is antisemitic is equating the two and being antisemitic themselves. That means you, Israel, ADL, etc, whoever.
You were always a sack of shit, don’t pretend it’s because other people did something.
They’re a troll who always takes the edgiest position possible. Ignore them.
That last sentence convinced me this is satirical. I really hope I’m right
Nah @tygerprints is a racist piece of shit and better off ignored usually.
I think they and @downpunxx are the same person using different accounts to fuck with people.
You are wrong. That poster is either the worst person ever or a terrible attempt at trolling by actually being the worse person ever.
The only reason I haven’t blocked them is that the responses calling them out remind me that most people aren’t complete assholes.
At first I thought you’re trying to simply mock the position, then I reread the other comment and withdrew my upvote.
It’s not only the last sentence that is terrible - it’s the last two. And sadly I don’t think this is satirical.
Removed by mod
Who are you voting for?
right now it would be Cornel West but Jill Stein can win me back
