• k_o_t@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    all of them are a useless insult used to avoid addressing the point

    • EnchantedWhetstones@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nah. It’s entirely fair and straight-to-the-point to tell people when they unwittingly reflect state department talking points.

      Why shouldn’t you? Because it hurts your feelings to discover you’re eating dogshit, not chocolate? Who cares?

      The other two are just fantasy.

      • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        because a talking point of some state department isn’t inherently right or wrong, rather you should evaluate the point on its own merit