A group of congressional Democrats from Massachusetts is urging the Biden administration to reverse a Donald Trump-era decision to place Cuba on the list of governments that support supposed terrorism.
In a letter sent to President Joe Biden last month and made public this week, the lawmakers spoke out against Cuba’s designation on the State Sponsor of Terrorism (SSOT) list, a move that Trump made just before he left office in 2021. They say that the designation was “vindictive” and is a major driver of current severe economic instability in Cuba, forcing a record number of people to flee the country in search of safe harbor.
“Given the information and evidence we have reviewed, Cuba should never have been placed again on the SSOT list. It was a vindictive action taken by the Trump Administration in January 2021 as it departed office, and the policy is well overdue for change,” the lawmakers wrote. “We believe the time to act and remove Cuba from the SSOT list is now — not months from now.”
They then point out that the record number of Cuban people trying to enter the U.S. at the southern border — part of the supposed immigration “crisis” that conservative lawmakers have been fearmongering over — is caused in large part by U.S. policy devastating Cuba’s economy and putting its people in danger.
“There is no political or other policy argument that can justify the U.S. continuing to knowingly add to the suffering of the Cuban people. The unabated hardships facing all sectors of Cuban society are the driving force for tens of thousands abandoning their homes and migrating to the United States,” the lawmakers wrote.
The letter effort was led by Representatives Ayanna Pressley and Jim McGovern, with signatures from Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey and Representatives Seth Moulton, Lori Trahan, and Stephen Lynch, all Massachusetts Democrats.
Cuba’s placement on the SSOT list means that it is subject to a series of harsh sanctions — many of which the U.S. has been imposing on the country for decades — that are causing shortages of food, medicine, and other crucial needs. The Obama administration had lifted some restrictions on travel and economic exchange in 2015, but the Trump administration reversed these and went even further in imposing hundreds more sanctions which human rights advocates have decried for their harsh, often violent effects.
On the 2020 campaign trial, Biden had pledged to “promptly reverse the failed Trump policies” on Cuba. But not only has Biden largely failed to act on this promise, advocates say that he has actually taken Trump’s already repressive policies even further, acting even more aggressively on the economic blockade than Trump did.
“As a candidate for President, you promised to address re-engagement with Cuba and return to the policy begun during the Obama-Biden administration, and we supported you on this commitment,” the lawmakers wrote.
“From the poorest and most vulnerable to the struggling private sector to religious, humanitarian and cultural actors, the Cuban people are enduring the most dire deprivations in recent memory — everyone is suffering,” they continued. “While there are multiple reasons for the economic crisis in Cuba, without a doubt a significant contributing factor is the restrictions and penalties facing international financial institutions and other entities because Cuba is on the SSOT list.”
For people who were curious about the flimsy justifications for the “state sponsor of terrorism” list inclusion like I was, which trump imposed again in 2019 and Biden admin has failed to lift, more details here:
Seems ridiculous they were put back on that list imo.
What’s truly ridiculous is how obvious it is and yet this Democrat held institution has done nothing about it.
Biden still thinks he can win Florida.
Yea, it is ridiculous. Regardless of how you feel about the embargo, Cubans are obviously not terrorists. Putting them on the list with jihadists is absurd.
In an election year? Fat chance. Biden wants all those Cuban migrant votes.
I know, you’re probably right, probably also why Obama didn’t start softening policy toward Cuba until his second term. But cmon Biden, Florida just isn’t happening. Do the right thing and maybe make other voters elsewhere happy too.
Is that really a major issue among independents? What about Democrats that wouldn’t normally vote?
It seems like a weird hill to die in just to speak to a subset of your base. He’d get a lot more traction focusing on Jan 6, election interference, and irresponsible fiscal policy (i.e. demonstrate how Trump grew the deficit and Biden lowered it). If I were Biden, I’d double down on fiscal policy since that’s extremely relevant now with higher borrowing rates, and throw in some social policies that are broadly popular (e.g. marijuana rescheduling) and don’t require new spending. Biden is well placed to be the “fiscal conservative who cares,” forcing Trump into the “tax cutter who hates immigrants” group. Basically, force Trump to repeat the same promises he made last time, and show how the failed to deliver.
deleted by creator
Yeah all those Cuban democrats lol
Absolutely baffling that Dems think they need to pander in this way to Cuban expats who are mostly Republican, in Republican states, like the embargo isn’t just propping up the power of the Cuban government in the first place.
Shit, you want to topple their regime?
Get more second-generation Cuban Americans heading back to say hi to grandma.
Extremely valid point
Unfortunately wouldn’t be so meaningful without also doing the same for North Korea. North Korea and Cuba are brotherly nations with similar short-term and long-term goals, with great admiration for each other. There is no excuse for most sanctions on these two countries, even by the standards of the US, and each country has made it abundantly clear that they will do everything they can to keep their entire populations educated, fed, housed, and politically active.
Amen to this! This one accomplishment could completely wipe out putin’s (near) future plans for Cuba.
It’s about time we got back together. This time without the mobsters.
Why do we need to do favors for the people of other countries to just force them in line with our policies? Why can’t we just let Cuba trade with the US, China and Russia, and the EU, keeping their connection with their usual countries in Latin America and Africa? Easing a brutal foreign policy that has removed billions in value from another country only by strict condition is pretty fucked up. With all the talk with the US and their freedom, we should really let Cuba have real freedom, their own freedom.
I think you’d probably need to pay reparations for the many decades of time under sanction, and even then it would be foolish of them to accept (and indeed they probably wouldn’t). Gaddafi showed them how the US treats its “allies” in the third world.
Also, if you think the US does anything outside of Europe* and the anglosphere** without mobsters, then you probably have US-paid mobsters to blame for the crack you’re smoking
*Obviously it also sometimes does things inside Europe with mobsters, see it’s longstanding support of a certain neo-nazi paramilitary
**I don’t have specific knowledge on this one beyond gangs within the US, but surely, right? The NYPD is a mob and they’ve got an office in the UK, anyway
