• AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Not really. A system like this would have to have its orbit synchronized to a single point on the ground, where the receiving station is. Which would make it a pretty shitty weapon. Even with thrusters, it will be very slow to move and would run out of fuel very fast if it needs to do much more than make micro-adjustments, like existing satellites use their thrusters for.

    • X51@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      I think the hurdles of targeting/aiming could be overcome without thrusters. The Mars land rover doesn’t use fuel. The sun would be the source of power.

      • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        The sun would be the source of power.

        In the vacuum of space, you need to eject mass to move. Unless you’re talking about a light sail, which is limited to tiny objects. I don’t know how the mars missions worked, but I imagine they would take advantage of Mars’s (thin, but still present) atmosphere.

        • X51@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          We’re talking 2 different things. Satellites are stationary. The movement would be to target something on the ground. That can be done with servo motors (electro-magnetic). No mass has to be ejected for that.