To manage the fund, Yahoo partnered with Harry Wu—a noted Chinese dissident turned powerful anti-China activist—and his nonprofit, the Laogai Research Foundation. But Wu grossly mismanaged YHRF, spending less than $650,000—or 4%—of the fund’s total $17.3 million on support for online dissidents, according to the current lawsuit. One year, YHRF allegedly spent $0 on what was meant to be its primary purpose. (Some defendants contest these calculations.)

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah capturing him alive was definitely preferable. You wanna avoid rolling heads whenever possible although at times it can seem enticing. What I found odd was the deep turmoil in Aang over the prospect of killing Ozai. It is consistent with the character but I wouldn’t have worried about it personally.

    Within the story’s ontology (as with most stories involving monarchies sadly), Ozai is not only the king by law but also a very poweful bender and his legitimacy as the king is derived from his talent. So taking away his bending is more effective than in a real world so to speak.

    • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, Aang’s reluctance to kill Ozai is kind of comical. It makes sense in the story, and you have very good points about Ozai suffering psychologically and socially after being stripped of his power and imprisoned rather than killed and martyred, though.

      • pigginz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lest we forget, it is a children’s cartoon from the US. Having the 12 year old hero of your animated show unambiguously take a human life or even be clearly planning to do so as the finale is not something the network would have approved even if the lib-as-fuck writers wanted it.