After a spy camera designed to look like a towel hook was purchased on Amazon and illegally used for months to capture photos of a minor in her private bathroom, Amazon was sued.

The plaintiff—a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia—argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

Amazon hoped the court would dismiss the suit, arguing that the platform wasn’t responsible for the alleged criminal conduct harming the minor. But after nearly eight months deliberating, a judge recently largely denied the tech giant’s motion to dismiss.

Amazon’s biggest problem persuading the judge was seemingly the product descriptions that the platform approved. An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon’s product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera. Text on that product image promoted the spycams, boasting that they “won’t attract attention” because each hook appears to be “a very ordinary hook.”

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    But there is something illegal about filming people in the bathroom on your property without their consent.

    Can you cite where you’re getting this information from?

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Before I do this. . .are you saying you think it might be legal to film someone without their consent when they are using your bathroom?

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, I’m asking for a source for your information.

        That’s why I asked if you can cite where you’re getting your information from.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          No

          So you realize it’s illegal, but also need me to cite that it’s illegal?

          The reason I’m hesitant is that it’s a complicated question that is going to be different based on jurisdiction. IANAL, but do have an interest in interpreting law. However, I certainly have zero experience with Brazilian law. So this could turn into a wild-goose chase of me learning Brazilian law for no reason. . .when we both realize that filming someone in your bathroom without their consent is illegal.

          • chitak166@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            when we both realize that filming someone in your bathroom without their consent is illegal.

            Well, you just said “it’s a complicated question that is going to be different based on jurisdiction.”

            If it’s not illegal in the jurisdictions this product is being sold, then your ‘it’s illegal’ argument holds no water. Hence why I asked you to cite where you’re getting your information.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, it’s complicated because I would have to answer the question multiple different ways. Like 2 party consent states are going to be different than 1 party consent states. And every state is going to be slightly different, with Brazil also being different.

              But it seems like we agree: it’s illegal to film someone in your bathroom without their consent. So why the busy-work exercise?