A mother and her 14-year-old daughter are advocating for better protections for victims after AI-generated nude images of the teen and other female classmates were circulated at a high school in New Jersey.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, officials are investigating an incident involving a teenage boy who allegedly used artificial intelligence to create and distribute similar images of other students – also teen girls - that attend a high school in suburban Seattle, Washington.

The disturbing cases have put a spotlight yet again on explicit AI-generated material that overwhelmingly harms women and children and is booming online at an unprecedented rate. According to an analysis by independent researcher Genevieve Oh that was shared with The Associated Press, more than 143,000 new deepfake videos were posted online this year, which surpasses every other year combined.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s fine and well. Except they are videos, and it is very difficult to prove they aren’t you. And the internet is forever.

    This isn’t like high school when you went to high school.

    Agreed on your last paragraph.

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Then nude leak scandals will quickly become a thing of the past, because now every nude video/picture can be assumed to be AI generated and are always fake until proven otherwise.

      That’s the silver lining of this entire ordeal.

      Again, this is a content distribution problem more than an AI problem, the liability should be on those who willingly host these deepfake content than on AI image generators.

      • finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That would be great in a perfect world, but unfortunately public perception is significantly more important than facts when it comes to stuff like this. People accused of heinous crimes can and do lose friends, their jobs, and have their life ruined even if they prove that they are completely innocent

        Plus, something I’ve already seen happen is someone says a nude is fake and are then told they have to prove that it’s fake to get people to believe them… which is very hard without sharing an actual nude that has something unique about their body

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          The rest of the human body has more unique traits than the nude parts. Freckles, birthmarks, scars, tattoos. Those are traits that are not possible to replicate unless the person specifically knows.

          Now that I think about it, we all proobably need a tattoo. That should clear anyone instantly.

          • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can ask an AI to draw a blurred version of the tattoo. Or to mask the tattooed area with, I don’t know, piece of clothes or something.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yes I’m sure a hiring manager is going to involve themselves that deeply in the pornographic video your face pops up in.

            HR probably wouldn’t even allow a conversation about it. That person just never gets called back.

            And then the worse part is the jobs that DO hire you. Now you have to question why they are hiring you. Did they not see the fake porn video? Or did they see it.

            The entire thing is damaging and ugly.

            • derpgon@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you are already an employee, then they, will want to keep you and look into the matter.

              If you are not an employee yet - is HR really looking up porn of everyone?

                • derpgon@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I am pretty sure people who do porn use pseudonyms anyway. If HR thinks the people use their real name and spread their porn on the internet, they are dumb for not realizing it’s fake. HR being HR as always.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Seems we’re partially applying market dynamics of supply and demand. Simply assuming the “surplus” supply of deep fakes will decrease their value ignores the fact that the demand is still there. Instead what we get is new value opportunities in the arms race of validating and distributing deep fakes.

      • toonicycle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean they obviously shouldn’t have to, but if nude photos of you got leaked in your community, people would start judging you negatively, especially if you’re a young woman. Also in these cases where they aren’t adults it would be considered cp.