• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is jargon for sure, and bloviating to mask layoffs.

    A merger will always have layoffs because there will be duplication of roles, especially in lower/middle management.

    Some duplication may also occur in boots-on-the-ground roles, depending on the companies.

      • jdf038@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe only masking in terms of trying to somehow make it seem justified and as a natural part of their company’s growth. But you’re not wrong.

      • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s “polite” and therefore right. The angry people are the ones being unreasonable and are thus wrong. They instead should write a calm sounding letter, submit it to the media that is totally not owned by the same shareholders that wronged them. /s