Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

Life at Sea Cruises’ first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

  • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not my idea of a good time either but it was appealing to some people. Cruises are incredibly popular. I’d only go if it were free and I was unable to sell the ticket(s).

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think I’d go if it were free. I have other things - productive things I could be doing.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think I’d go if it were free. I have other things - productive things I could be doing.

    • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      But you’d still go? Like… if I bought you a ticket on a shitty cruise, you’d go just because you have to use up free things?

      • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Who’s saying no to a free holiday? I went away this year for the first time in a decade and it was heavenly. I’d never chose to go on a cruise, but I’d jump at the chance for a new experience, some sun and relaxation - especially over winter when I having to chose between heating and eating ffs.

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you bought me a ticket on “Unkle Sal’s Discount Cruises” I would not go. If you bought me tickets for Carnival Cruises… Yeah I’d probably go.