Ah yes, elitism and othering. I mean, I’m making this art for myself, so the fact that luddites who paradoxically use the internet are angry with me arnet going to stop me using it (See? I can other too!)
Yep. Maybe look into the supply chains that go into making the computer chips for your phones/computers. Pretty hypocritical of you to judge others for using tech that isnt 100% ethically sourced/founded when you are speaking to them using tech that is also impossible to ethically source and obtain. I specifically avoid using artist style tags in my prompts, and do what I can to lessen the grey in my usage of the tech. What are you doing to lessen the grey in your cellphone/computer usage? How dare you profit off of slave labour just so you can look at cat memes?
Bunch of losers that always hated artists and art started calling themselves “”“”“”“”“artists”“”“”“” because they can ask a machine to show them titties (like they couldn’t before), and then use the defence that “artists are othering me even though I’m an artist too!” fuck off.
You’re like a kid that got an easy bake oven and some cake mix and thinks they’re a chef.
Going to a restaurant and telling the cooks they should just surrender before your technological superiority.
Because don’cha know it’s the future and the future can and should roll over millions of people and human suffering is just a variable in an excel sheet and not even the most important, I can ask the computer to show me titties now!
We go from “EASY BAKE OVENS ARE THE FUTURE, COOKS SHOULD JUST GET A REAL JOB LIKE PROGRAMMING” to “Children are just enjoying their easy bake ovens, why are you yelling at them they aren’t real chefs?” in a heartbeat.
Giving you the brainpower to understand what your points equate to is not moving goal posts. The vast majority of AI artists dont think traditional artists aren’t real artists nor do they really care if traditional artists jump on board or not, we are making the art for ourselves likely using completely open source models like Stable Diffusion, so no capitalist is being enriched by us. You arent capable of engaging with people who dont agree with you on your definition of art (or maybe not you but in other arguers point, theft) in good faith, so you attempt to character assassinate us instead
edit: Anyways, I’m tired of your celsius room temperature IQ takes, so in a couple minutes after you’ve read this response, I’ll be blocking you
I mean if the shoe made in a sweatshop fits. Why the hell are you allowed to use things not completely ethically clean and I’m not? AI art isnt dark enough ethically to be killed in its crib, its far less dark than other things we allow in our day to day lives, its just new and scary, and the Art field has a history of labelling new forms of it as not valid
Ah yes, elitism and othering. I mean, I’m making this art for myself, so the fact that luddites who paradoxically use the internet are angry with me arnet going to stop me using it (See? I can other too!)
“How dare you go against this unethical thing that works based on theft, even though you use technology?”
Yep. Maybe look into the supply chains that go into making the computer chips for your phones/computers. Pretty hypocritical of you to judge others for using tech that isnt 100% ethically sourced/founded when you are speaking to them using tech that is also impossible to ethically source and obtain. I specifically avoid using artist style tags in my prompts, and do what I can to lessen the grey in my usage of the tech. What are you doing to lessen the grey in your cellphone/computer usage? How dare you profit off of slave labour just so you can look at cat memes?
Yeah yeah yeah whatever.
Bunch of losers that always hated artists and art started calling themselves “”“”“”“”“artists”“”“”“” because they can ask a machine to show them titties (like they couldn’t before), and then use the defence that “artists are othering me even though I’m an artist too!” fuck off.
You’re like a kid that got an easy bake oven and some cake mix and thinks they’re a chef.
Going to a restaurant and telling the cooks they should just surrender before your technological superiority.
Because don’cha know it’s the future and the future can and should roll over millions of people and human suffering is just a variable in an excel sheet and not even the most important, I can ask the computer to show me titties now!
Lmao ok there grampa, have fun yelling at children that are just enjoying their easy bake ovens that they aren’t real chefs
Goalposts. Moving.
We go from “EASY BAKE OVENS ARE THE FUTURE, COOKS SHOULD JUST GET A REAL JOB LIKE PROGRAMMING” to “Children are just enjoying their easy bake ovens, why are you yelling at them they aren’t real chefs?” in a heartbeat.
Giving you the brainpower to understand what your points equate to is not moving goal posts. The vast majority of AI artists dont think traditional artists aren’t real artists nor do they really care if traditional artists jump on board or not, we are making the art for ourselves likely using completely open source models like Stable Diffusion, so no capitalist is being enriched by us. You arent capable of engaging with people who dont agree with you on your definition of art (or maybe not you but in other arguers point, theft) in good faith, so you attempt to character assassinate us instead
edit: Anyways, I’m tired of your celsius room temperature IQ takes, so in a couple minutes after you’ve read this response, I’ll be blocking you
appeal to hypocrisy
I mean if the shoe made in a sweatshop fits. Why the hell are you allowed to use things not completely ethically clean and I’m not? AI art isnt dark enough ethically to be killed in its crib, its far less dark than other things we allow in our day to day lives, its just new and scary, and the Art field has a history of labelling new forms of it as not valid