And your artists wouldn’t exist without generations of artists before them and a bunch of scientists developing the computers that run all the tools modern artists use.
What exactly is your point here? Are we morally obliged to safeguard current artists, simply because their predecessors once made significant contributions to the field?
BTW, don’t argue ad hominem. I’m not pro AI, I’m just against unjustified entitlement.
Take away the photoshop and the drawing tablet and those artists will still know how to draw using pencils and paper. Take away the AI and those that use it won’t know what to do.
And your artists wouldn’t exist without generations of artists before them and a bunch of scientists developing the computers that run all the tools modern artists use.
What exactly is your point here? Are we morally obliged to safeguard current artists, simply because their predecessors once made significant contributions to the field?
BTW, don’t argue ad hominem. I’m not pro AI, I’m just against unjustified entitlement.
Take away the photoshop and the drawing tablet and those artists will still know how to draw using pencils and paper. Take away the AI and those that use it won’t know what to do.
Take away the supermarket around the corner and both of us, and most artists, will starve.
BTW: can you make paint from whatever nature provides you? Can you make paper and pencils?