• poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Speculating here, but it sounds like the offending post got reported by some overzealous fedizen, but then the admin had a short look at the post timeline of this person and decided it was neither worth keeping the account nor worth discussing with them. Stuff like that happens sometimes 🤷‍♂️

    And this kind of complaining in a blog post kinda proves the admin might have been correct in their quick assessment.

    • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Complaining that you’ve been banned for a seemingly innocuous post isn’t proof that you deserved to be banned. If the author is telling the full story, the admin(s) of their instance were in the wrong.

      And this is a legitimate issue. If new fedi users try out an instance and get banned without warning, they’re unlikely to try another instance. I want the fediverse to have a wider array of people and conversations happening, but that can’t happen if admins are quick to ban instead of engaging their users.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If the author is telling the full story…

        Key word is the first word there. Everybody who has ever been banned from a site or server in all of the Internet’s history was innocent when they tell the tale.