• ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What happened with her? She seemed okay when she was running a few elections ago and had some support, but then went a bit off and I stopped following her.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I didn’t. I refuted it with just as strong a claim as they made. if you think you can get them to provide a source, go for it. I happen to know it’s untrue, so I don’t care to bicker with them about it.

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          42
          ·
          11 months ago

          Source: your ass

          All you liberals have is a picture of her at a table with Putin as if Democrats you vote for haven’t sat at a table with Putin before

          • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/26/facebook-russia-trump-sanders-stein-243172

            It’s a well-established fact that a part of her social media campaign was funded by the Russians.

            To be clear: I’m not saying she necessarily did all this in cahoots with Putin. Russia funded divisive ads that boosted Sanders too. Regardless, Sanders quit the race whilst Stein did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead, instead of the democrat candidate that a green voter is likely more aligned with. It’s an unfortunate effect of the two-party system. Nonetheless, those effects are well-known and Stein had a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected. She knew this, but decided to remain on the ballot anyway. Her candidacy therefore did help Trump win the election.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Sanders quit the race whilst Stein did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead,

              i can do this too!

              Sanders quit the race whilst Clinton did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead, instead of the green candidate that a democrat voter is likely more aligned with.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            as if Democrats you vote for haven’t sat at a table with Putin before

            Such as? Apart from, you know, people who were president and were doing it because presidents generally meet other world leaders?

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              she’s a presidential candidate. i don’t think there is a meaningful difference in stature, but there is in substance: she never exchanged a word with him or shook his hand, unlike the fascists and fascist-enablers you’re defending.

              • osarusan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Wow. She somehow got herself a seat at Putin’s table, then she sat down quietly, politely ate her sandwich, then got up and left without ever saying a word or interacting with the people at the table?

                How unlucky she must have felt to find herself such an awkward situation. Egg on her face and all that.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            as if Democrats you vote for haven’t sat at a table with Putin before

            For example?

  • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you like the ideas of the Green Party, vote for them at the local level. The fact that they don’t seem to want to govern at the local level is enough for me to ignore them as an option.

    • osarusan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This needs to be said more than anything else.

      Politics NEVER changes from the top down. You don’t elect some absolute newcomer who circumvents all the normal paths and then completely revolutionizes the country. (At least not in a stable, functioning society.) Politics in the US happens from the ground up. Not top down.

      If any third party was serious about changing society, they would start at the local level. Then, after proving that they can enact meaningful change and bridge the divide between the huge political span that Americans hold, they would sweep their state elections and federal elections.

      All of these pie-in-the-sky parties who think that they will win the presidency and then somehow enact society-changing legislation (_the president doesn’t make laws!!!_) are either fools or charlatans.

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gayle McLaughlin used to be the Green Party’s best example of what they could do at the local level, until she left in 2016 to vote for Bernie Sanders. I’m fairly certain she is the outlier.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Right. I do believe that many members of the Green Party are good political options. It’s just they as a party don’t rally around them. They only seem to push for the presidency. I don’t see how they can hope to accomplish anything when they seem to shoot for the moon every four years, and only manage to spoil things.

        Until I start seeing good options on the ballots from the Greens, I will just continue to hope the progressives win the dem. primaries for my local seats.

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They only seem to push for the presidency

          This is the key indicator and red flag that they are a clown party that isn’t serious about politics. They’re in it for the attention and the money.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      vote for them at the local level.

      They only run in a handful of local races. I’ve lived in both a red state and a blue state- Indiana and California- in multiple districts and I have never once seen a green party candidate on the local level.

      • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is literally my point. Ignore them until they seem to want governance as opposed to only seeing them in national headlines tilting at windmills. It’s worthless.

        If you like Stein’s platform, voting for Stein will decrease the likelihood of you ever seeing such a policy implemented. If, say, a state rep. runs on a Green platform, they would likely get my vote.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            Cool. I really hate the English use of “you” when “one” is really the word one wants. But when one uses “one” as opposed to “you”, one sounds crazy.

            I honestly think a lot of online defensiveness arises from this construction.

            I’m saying, it sounds like I’m saying “you need to do blah cuz you’re wrong about blah”, when I would prefer it to be read as reiterating my earlier point of “if one wants to see Green policies enacted, one would do well to ignore Jill Stein.”

    • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      They can’t run local level candidates without funding. All you do is complain instead of help.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        And they can run presidential candidates without funding??? What the heck are you talking about?

        • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s easier to raise awareness of the campaign, and yes they historically get much more attention and funding.

    • MedicatedMaybe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      We certainly do, but you wouldn’t catch me voting for that Russian stooge after everything that went down in 2016.

      • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        The federal government doesn’t control elections. You handle that at the state (or county/parish/whatever) level. At least here in Oregon, people can bring measures to the ballot by petition rather than waiting for the legislature to do anything about it, and given two party monopoly, they aren’t going to do anything about it for you.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So the Dems then, their voting rights policy has moved towards at the very least making it much easier to switch to a PR system of any kind.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      We need ranked choice or approval voting before third parties actually have a chance.

    • flta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is implying Jill Stein doesn’t know she is helping Republicans with her failed 3rd party run.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            the greens are his opponent too. a vote for a green candidate doesn’t help the republicans or the democrats.

            • morphballganon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              And who do you think might consider voting for a Green candidate? Certainly not republicans. There is significant overlap between the democracy crowd and the environmentalism crowd. Thus, a significant chunk of green voters would otherwise be democratic voters.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                then i guess the democrats better shift to capture some of them green voters if they want them.

                • morphballganon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That attitude is precisely why we were stuck with Trump from 2017-2020, and why the country is much worse off now because of it.

                  I voted for Gary Johnson is 2016 and let me tell you, I learned from my mistake. It seems you have yet to learn that lesson.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not this shit again. Our country literally might not survive another Donald Trump presidency, which is what you’re helping happen by supporting a 3rd-party candidate when we have a 2-party system.

    1. Keep Trump and his goons from taking power
    2. Vote local. This is where things like ranked-choice voting and reproductive rights are created and have impact
    3. When it’s not “first past the post”, vote for whoever you want, guilt-free! At this point, there’s no such thing as a spoiler candidate…

    It’s called priorities.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      vote for whoever you want, guilt-free

      i do this now. the only decision i have left to make is whether it’s going to be jill stein or cornel west.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wow, her chance of winning is so high. And won’t tip the results toward the right wing at all And pigs have wings

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Something something Russian check is in the mail Jill.

      Totally not running as a spoiler, nahhh. Not good ol Jill Spoiler Stein! She just wants you to Send A Message™ (at an incredibly important time that has lasting repercussions if you actually follow through.)

      Here’s an idea, if you actually gave a shit Jill, why not lead the charge for ranked choice voting!!! Put your damn face all over the media when it’s not an election year so you can actually push for positive change. At least then you’d stand a chance and people could actually vote for you! But no, that’s not the intent. The intent is to syphon votes from Democrats again.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Her last campaign went heavy on ranked choice (as all green party candidates have been) but the green party has to run candidates to retain ballot access and therefore retain members. Campaigns are also a great way to promote issues ignored by major candidates (such as rcv) but the press has not been kind to third parties since ross perot so its not a surprise most people are unfamiliar with green party platforms.

        in 2023 post covid her tepid vaccine skepticism seems like some major baggage (along with 2016s brutal coverage) and I wouldn’t be surprised if she was more picking up jimmy dore style dumbass voters this time around and less acting as a spoiler. Her reputation is so toxic at this point that it does seem like the green party is throwing democrats a bone here.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        i think she’d be just as happy to “syphon votes from” republicans. i think she wants all the votes she can get and doesn’t much care who your second choice would be.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        democrats don’t own the votes, the voters do. they need to earn them like everyone else.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Of course they don’t own the votes, but you vote to get an outcome. If you’re voting for someone third party who has literally 0 chance of winning, but actually agree with some of what the Democrats want and not much at all of what Republicans want then the only outcome you get is the party you agree with least winning because you wanted to send a message to the party you partially agreed with.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            the only outcome you get is the party you agree with least winning because you wanted to send a message to the party you partially agreed with.

            it’s not about sending a message to democrats or republicans. it’s about who i want to win. also, it’s really hard to tell which party i agree with least.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s what I thought the first time as well. It turns out that who you want to win means fuck all in real life. It’s a bit like saying “I don’t want my arm to be broken” when you fall on it. I’m sure you don’t, but if you care about how it heals you’ll go to the hospital and get a cast put on it, even if it’s uncomfortable.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                if it means so much to you, I live in a swing state. the state penalty for selling my vote is $5k. that’s the federal fine, too. put another 10k on top for my troubles and I’ll vote any way you like.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I wouldn’t count on the Democrats to keep genocidal maniacs from your doorstep. better to get a gun and join a local resistance movement.

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’d rather the people that don’t presently want genocidal maniacs killing me and my friends be in office than the genocidal maniacs themselves, and you must recognize that it is, in fact, one of those two choices that are going to win.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                they’re not the same with one exception tho. they’re both deeply bad In similar and unique ways. neither is acceptable.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Good news is there’s like 300 of you in the country so it doesn’t matter

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Green Party will always run a candidate. Just be thankful their candidate is the charmless husk of a moron that is Jill Stein.

  • KinNectar@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know what would be amazing, if a third party candidate would run and then demand policy position concessions form the Democratic nominee in exchange for dropping out, rather than running through the election and risking a Republican presidency.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The green party is routinely funded by the GOP. Their existence is to be a spoiler and pull votes from Dems to swing races towards republicans.

      They’re already doing what they’re being paid to do.

    • bedrooms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I think that’s the only rational way to interpret her run. Even she doesn’t want to run through.

      Edit: I checked her record on previous runs, and omg I was so wrong…

        • bedrooms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          How on the hell do Green party members stand behind her? Her leadership undermines all the good intentions of the party policies.