• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I have issues with the snap implementation, I really want to live in a world where my base os is solid and everything else is easily updatable. LTS, with the latest apps.

    Snap and flatpak achieve this, and I want more of that. Just less… frustrating. And less not-invented-here like.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And less not-invented-here like.

      The only party playing that game is Canonical. Everybody else already agreed on Flatpak.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Flatpak cannot do what’s discussed in the article. Snap can and it was started prior to Flatpak. If Flatpak was able to do what Snap can, you’d have half a point.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Snap has the ability to do the base system in a much more modular way and could be really cool for an immutable system. Forcing them on desktop users with their transitional deb packages and making it heavily integrated with only one repository really screwed it up.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also I’m not sure about slow startup times. Are those still an issue? If so, then I would be sure to considet Ubuntu dead and not only not recommend it but actively recommend switching away from it.

        • zod000@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, they are still an issue. It is irritating enough that I have currently zero snaps and would rather build from source if snap is the only binary option.