• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole philosophy is how to get the outcomes you want, any means are justified.

    Saying person X is playing into person Ys playbook is making huge assumptions about their goals.

    We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

      And I thank you for that exposition, however cynical it does give some reason to what appears madness.

      But if it comes to serving the people of Palestine they aren’t really doing that, rather the opposite.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas is not working in the best interest of Palestine civilians, they are working in the best interest of Hamas - Which is a fascist theocratic military organization with goals of ethnic cleansing.

        The only issue at question is why did the Gazan people feel that Hamas was their best option in 2006 when they were elected into office? I don’t really know, I can speculate that the hopeless turn to extreme religious war mongers for even the promise of a better future. Since 2006, and the failed coup in 2007, Hamas hasn’t held any elections and runs as a dictatorship.