• Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Netanyahu: Hamas is a terrorist organization that wants to eliminate the Jewish nation

      Hamas: yeah he’s right

      • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why Nethanyahu funded them.

        All his investments paid off in this neat little casus belli.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          He allowed Hamas to be funded but it’s still horrific the hand he had in making this monster. He allowed Hamas to grow so it would fight those looking to negotiate toward a two-state solution.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Netanyahu does not state that killing of civilians is his goal, nor does IDF purposely do that. Imagine the amount of civilian deaths if it were actually IDF’s goal, as it is for Hamas.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “When he came of age for conscription into the Israel Defense Forces at 18, he was exempted from service by the IDF due to his extreme-right political background.”

          What a guy. I thought militaries (and police) love those people.

          • DanL4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israeli military is not for volunteers, it’s for everyone. The top ranking generals and chiefs of staff were prominent against Netanyahu and this extremist incompetent government. They are also said that human rights activists that give a voice to solders that saw atrocious acts of the idf itself. This is not the norm, contrary to what the media would have you think. This, according to the top ranking Israeli ex officers, is how the idf should fix its wrongs.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is an important distinction in my opinion. Does the IDF care if they kill palestinian civilians? No. But they aren’t actively trying to murder as many palestinian civilians as they can either.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being so incredibly nonchalant about killing civilians as the IDF is it’s almost an insignificant difference imo.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How should I know. What I do know however is that if the IDF wanted, they could kill many more Gazans.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seriously look at their actions and decide for yourself whether or not they are going out of their way to kill civilians or whether they are so careless they kill anyone on their way

              The idea that the IDF would have to beat Gaza into a pulp so we can finally admit to ourselves that they don’t care about civilians is weak, not to mention a logical fallacy. This isn’t the indication to look for when war crimes happen. It’s the actions of the IDF themselves.

              Just look at all the times Israel told civilians to move to one place them bombed the shit out of the place.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Maybe they just want plausible deniability more than they want immediate genocide. It sure looks to me like that’s what they’re doing, and that it’s working.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because Hamas has used it as a base for decades…

            Just like every other piece of civilian infrastructure.

            You say Jabalia like it hasn’t been a city since the 40s. It’s not some tent city. It’s a legitimate city that has been around for decades, which Hamas only took control of after 2007.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes totally, that is enough excuse to shoot dead over a hundred people and wound hundreds more.

              Tents or not, you’re basically saying Israel bombed a crowded area and I’m afraid they are losing this one in the media. 😊

              It’s a refugee camp because people who live there are more victims of Israeli displacement.

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not a refugee camp at all. It’s a city that has existed for almost a century.

                You can cheer for Hamas. Your emojis don’t mean shit lol. Nobody else supports them. Even “the media” (you sound like my drug addicted religious dad here).

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  First, I didn’t cheer for Hamas.

                  Also, That area is still a refugee camp. You are confusing Jabalia city with the Jabalia refugee camp.. It’s okay to be wrong, you just have to admit it to yourself.

                  And the very fact that somehow bombing people taking refuge in a city rather than a refigee camp is something you needed to point out as though that changes anything … That’s very telling.

                  And lastly, Israel is losing the media war. 😊 It’s not sustainable to kill more people and get away with it, not when even holocaust historians are alarmed at the Israeli rhetoric and massacre it keeps committing on a daily basis.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Jabalia refugee camp consists of an area that is 1,4 km2. It had a registered population of about 50 000 inhabitants in 2017, who knows how much these days. It’s not exactly a small place, even if the term “refugee camp” might give that image.

            So who knows. Perhaps they’re just murdering civilians, or perhaps a place like that is a perfect breeding ground for extremism.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabalia_refugee_camp

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. Israel bombed a giant refugee camp. How is this helping Israel’s case?

              • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                I dunno, as – believe it or not – I’m not part of IDF. But you can of course wonder: are they fighting a popularity war or an actual one?

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well, I, for one, hope that the IDF is finally fucking losing the popularity war. Until the US stops propping them up no matter what, they have no incentive to seriously work towards peace.

                  If they were fighting an actual war, then the leaders of Israel would be pulled into the ICC for war crimes.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re not doing their supporters any favours with these sort of comments lol

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s easy to support Palestinian statehood. Anyone that supports Hamas is a moron.

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      They shouldn’t have any fucking supporters. This is the shit all the anti-Israel people are supporting. I’m no fan of Netanyahu but wtf do they expect Israel to do? It’s like everyone forgot what prompted this and thinks Israel just woke up one morning and decided to raze everything because they were bored.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m no fan of Netanyahu but wtf do they expect Israel to do?

        I expect them not to commit war crimes at a bare minimum.

      • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just gotta take that line of thought one step further. I believe in you.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        being both anti-israel and anti-hamas at the same time is the only correct position i don’t understand why this isn’t obvious

        • Cowars@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because Hamas is the only resistance Palestinians have against the colonizer.

          • nutsack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            it isn’t, actually. they have a government with a prime minister and a president which oppose hamas and which netanyahu wants nobody to pay attention to because they are the legitimate path to statehood

            • Cowars@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well then Netanyahu is doing a great job because I heard that Hamas was elected by the palestinians and I never heard about another Palestinian government.

              • nutsack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it was elected a long time ago and since then they have fallen out of favor and there was never an election again

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, that not totally incorrect. The settlers starting moving in (before the nation was a thing) and started killing and displacing the existing inhabitants. It’s been bad from the start, though they have had periods that are better than others. People excuse Israel for what Hamas has done, but rarely do those same people forgive Hamas for what the Jewish settlers have done.

        Personally, I don’t make a judgment on Hamas. They are a much weaker force against a much stronger force. If they fight a conventional war then they don’t stand a chance. Gorilla warfare/terrorism is the only viable option for them. Israel uses terrorism every day, but it’s only bad when Hamas does it?

        I do judge Israel. They are a strong force, and more importantly are getting support from many other powerful nations. Until my country (the US) stops sending support, I will criticize their actions. I do not condone my money going towards what they do.

      • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What prompted this? You mean the decades of occupation? Or are you suggesting history only began with the Hamas attack?

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which supporters?

        People supporting the Palestinian side in this conflict

        • Five@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t confuse support for Palestinians as support for Hamas.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s deliberate. If you don’t support Israel’s apartheid of Palestine, you are apparently antisemitic and want Israel destroyed.

              Hamas is not helping things. They are bunch of murderous religious nutters. They do want Israel gone. Just like how Israel’s nutters want Palestine gone.

              But Hamas are not Palestine anymore than Israel is its religious nutters.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I support the innocent Palestinian people who are being slaughtered. Does that mean I support Hamas? Because I think Hamas is an Iranian puppet that wants a Palestinian caliphate run under Sharia law. I don’t think they help the Palestinian people either. So am I a Hamas supporter? By your definition, apparently.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure what you think my definition was, can you expand on that part?

        • 0ryX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only issue I see are the dumbasses that cant tell the difference, supporting Palestinians doesn’t mean support for Hamas. But if you don’t think they need some sort of military support in one way or another you don’t need to be making comments about it and need to instead go back and read a little history about the Israelie Occupation and Crimes Against Humanity thats taken place. Hell you wouldn’t even have to go back in time very far but a year maybe less, but I suggest to get the full picture and decent understanding to allow yourself to come and discuss world topics with other adults that you start from the beginning.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only issue I see are the dumbasses that cant tell the difference, supporting Palestinians doesn’t mean support for Hamas.

            There’s a lot of dumbasses out there, which is sorta the issue.

    • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to condone their actions, but what would Hamas care about getting supporters? Palestine situation hasn’t been helped much at all by international supporters, so it’s not like they care about that.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The two are linked together. When aid has been sent to Palestine, to help Palestinians, Hamas has taken it for themselves. There was an EU project I believe to build water infrastructure, and Hamas took it apart to make into rockets.

        I don’t think it’s possible to provide material support to the Palestinians. Hamas just takes it all. It’s so fucked.

      • mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Palestine is dependent on foreign aid to continue its war fighting. Specifically aid from western nations. They need supporters to feed, fuel and supply it’s military and populace.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Might make people less happy to support pummeling them if they weren’t acting like such villains

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to condone their actions, but what would Hamas care about getting supporters?

        For one, all the Hamas supporters are asking the US to tell Israel to stop attacking them.

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    A senior member of Hamas has hailed the systematic slaughter of civilians in Israel

    When asked whether this meant the complete annihilation of Israel, Hamas replied: “Yes, of course.”

    who still thinks hamas are the good guys?

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re coming to any international conflict, but specially to this one, from a “good guys/bad guys” framework you’re absolutely not helping.

      Sometimes (a lot of times, sadly) all you get in a particular issue is just assholes all the way down. Unsurprisingly, deadly military conflicts where both sides have proven at best a callous disregard for civilian casualties practically requires the asshole pile to be expansive and thorough.

      The question is how you get the endless, writhing mass of assholes to stop. Which isn’t looking great right now.

    • fer0n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I made the mistake of commenting on this post where people clearly think that the Hamas are the good guys and have every right to do what they do. Apologies for linking to it.

      • TheDankHold@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course if you go to tankie central you get tankies. They’re also acting like Putin didn’t order the shelling and capture of Ukrainian cities and it’s all just (insert kremlin talking point here).

        They are a specific niche of political mind. The kind that only thinks western nations are capable of propaganda and evil. Don’t take them as representative of smarter people.

        • fer0n@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I shouldn’t have commented. That post ended up in my hot/all feed and I didn’t really look at the community. I was frankly quite confused as to what’s up with these people until I saw the upvoted Russian propaganda comment which cleared things up quite a bit.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nobody said they were.

      edit: okay crazy people on a lemmygrad site said they were. But that page that guy linked looked about as nice as a 4chan site…

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Somebody told me recently on here that “Hamas is facing a genocide” apparently without any sort of irony or remorse.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering I’ve been banned from World News at even suggesting reality in regards to how militaries fight in such conflicts…

        Yeah, even mods are ban happy regarding Israel/Palestine lol.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That isn’t what a tankie is at all. A tankie is someone who defends authoritarian governments because the governments are “left wing” or rivals of the US. Having a left wing economic policy isn’t even close. Hell you can be a Communist and still not be a tankie.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who still thinks any state is the good guys? Hamas and Israel are both enemies of the people.

      The only way to cut through the propagandistic lies of these groups is to point out that neither truly represents the people they say they do.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, Hamas took power by killing Palestinian civilians. They don’t represent anyone and they openly say they will martyr civilians.

        The Palestinian National Authority (Fatah) was the democratically elected government of Palestine before 2007. Hamas staged a coup and executed Fatah officials, which is why Gaza and the West Bank are separate entities today.

        Hamas is as much a state as Al-Qaeda. They’re a terrorist group that seized power by way of murder and have openly declared they intend to use their citizens as shields and martyrs.

        They’re not a state. They’re a terror cell that deserves to be eliminated. Unfortunately their own admitted tactics of using civilians as shields means that civilians will be killed.

        • probablyaCat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a lie. Hamas won the vote. The EU, UN, and the Carter Center all called those elections free and fair. If anything, Hamas was an underdog given that Israel, in collaboration with Fatah, kept arresting the politicians in Hamas as they defined Hamas a terrorist organization. Fatah and Israel wanted to delay the elections, but with the encouragement of the US (GWB in particular who felt Hamas would definitely not win), they decided to keep them as they were. Stop making things up to fit your narrative. Hamas still typically wins the popular vote in polling done since then. You have a fucking computer. Just google it. It’s all there in black and white.

          I mean they did have conflicts with Fatah. But the biggest fights weren’t until after they won the election.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          They aren’t making the IDF bomb apartment buildings, which is something they’ve been doing for decades, before Israel helped create Hamas.

          https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/hamas-israel-palestine-conflict/

          So where is Israel’s responsibility there, in sponsoring terrorists? Or do we pretend notiing happened before the last few weeks because then we can sort of pretend Israel has no culpability, you know, if we squint and try to avoid looking at the bombing of civilians?

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes they are. By their own admission in this article.

            Hamas by their own damn admission uses civilians as shields and intends to martyr them.

            Your article leaves out the fact that Israel funded and supported several Islamic organizations at the time in both Gaza and the West Bank. One became a terrorist institution.

            Take the whole history into account. After the six day war, Israel was in the position that they needed all the support they could get. So they supported anyone that opposed the PLO, which was sponsored by Egypt and Fatah. Because that’s who they just were attacked by.

            Israel funded dozens of Islamic organizations that were opposed to Fatah, including mosques and schools. Hamas came out of one of them.

          • probablyaCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That article has such a stupid take. It takes tiny pieces of quotes from a couple of ex-Israeli officials and with one of them is clearly omitting context. Did Israel permit Islamist groups to do stuff like build mosques and have charities? Yes. Did he also say, but it is not mentioned in the article, that they were completely peaceful at the time and that Israel didn’t want to be viewed as attacking Islam? Also yes.

            See, what you are saying is that Israel created Hamas by not using more oppression to stop these groups at a time when they were not attacking Israel, but the PLO was. And that is just such a simple naive take that it is ridiculous. Yeah if Israel could redo things, they might have decided that was a good idea. But then again, what if it just caused more attacks from the surrounding countries after they were claimed to be “attacking Islam.” Then would we also blame Israel for those attacks due to them repressing the Islamist movements?

            It even does the same by using cherry picked foresight about Afghanistan. It entirely ignores the situation in Afghanistan and just implies that the US caused Al Qaeda. Things just aren’t that simple. It’s entirely possible that had the US and other countries not interfered in Afghanistan that the soviet union would’ve lasted longer and Afghanistan might’ve been another Chechnya.

            At the time, Israel was having to fight against the PLO. They were not fighting against the religious Islamic groups. And knowing the history of the time period and the politics in the region, the very religious groups were not nearly the force that they are now. So they made choices for reasons that absolutely made sense at the time. And we have no way of knowing how things would be different if they made different choices.

            We can say that places that aren’t Israel still have issues with the Muslim brotherhood or are friendly with them all over the middle east. And Israel certainly didn’t create the Muslim Brotherhood. And if Israel didn’t exist and it was all a Palestinian state with a secular government, it isn’t a stretch to say that they would be in that area too, calling for an Islamist government. As they have done in Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and more.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Difference is, Israel isn’t meant to represent palestinian people, Hamas is. And they are doing a great job of it, if their job is getting civilians killed.

        Edit: Just think about the massive protests against Netanyahu earlier in the year. Do those show how in tune the Israeli government and people are? No. But the very fact they could protest mostly peacefully differentiates Israel’s treatment of its population from all of its neighbours.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          The… what? I have no idea what you’re even trying to say.

          The IDF is still dropping bombs on civilians. You can invent whatever bullshit you feel like, it doesn’t make that somehow okay.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The IDF is dropping bombs on (suspected) Hamas holdouts, which are all conveniently located next to civilians.

              • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Doesn’t change the fact that in this conflict, the IDF are trying to get Hamas targets with their attacks. And that the Hamas are the ones that built their infrastructure next to civilians, that Hamas did kill Israeli civilians indiscriminately and that the Hamas knew full well, that by building their infrastructure next to civilians and by mindlessly raiding Israeli territory, the IDF would respond and kill palestinian civilians while doing so. Israel wants to crush Hamas. Hamas wants as many people to die as possible, so that Israel is made a pariah internationally.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Right… so it’s so predictable that the IDF would bomb civilians that any provocation makes the provoker guilty of their murders?

                  So basically the IDF are so irredeemable in your eyes they’re just a force of nature or something?

                  Again, you’re also ignoring the fact that Israel created Hamas.

                  And Israel SHOULD be a pariah. The only reason they’ve gotten away with this genocide for so long is because they’ve had unconditional US state backing.

              • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                It makes sense because it doesn’t violate Geneva conventions. If there are combatants hiding among civilians their deaths are 100% on said combatants. What do you expect Israel to do? After a terrorist attack that is equal to 17 (!) times the scope of 9/11 just to shrug it off and send more humanitarian aid to be pillaged by Hamas?

                • anteaters@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  100%. People here scream “genocide” and “war crimes” but have no idea what these words mean. The “friends” of Palestine here make even Reddit look normal.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Palestine territories are vassal states of Israel. Israel is ultimately responsible for the safety of civilians in the territory they control.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hamas and Israel are both enemies of the people.

        Uhmm. Are you aware that Israel is #4 on the World Happiness Index this year? It’s the happiest non-scandinavic country in the world. You don’t get there by being “enemy of the people”.

        Here are the rankings of Israel’s neighbors:

        • Egypt #121
        • Jordan #123
        • Lebanon #136 (second worst of all measured)
        • State of Palestine #99

        Israel is obviously not the problem in that area.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, extremely wealthy country propped up by imperialism has a high happiness rating compared to extremely poor countries being stomped on by that same imperial war machine.

          Surely the poor countries are the problem.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You must understand that you cannot explain it away like that. Palestine perhaps you might, but funnily enough, it’s the happiest country of those four.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why not? Literally just give any explanation. You didn’t even try to explain in your first comment how “happiness” has anything to do with this.

              • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Why not? Literally just give any explanation.

                Egypt’s, Jordan’s and Lebanon’s bad standings in the happiness scale cannot in any way be explained away by Israel. Just because you lost several wars against an enemy several decades ago isn’t enough to explain any of it. So it’s all on them. As I said, Palestine’s bad situation might be explained by Israel, but again, it’s the happiest of those four.

                You didn’t even try to explain in your first comment how “happiness” has anything to do with this.

                You said that both Hamas and Israel are the enemies of the people. I disproved that notion by noting how Israel is #4 happiest country in the world. My apologies, I thought the inference was obvious.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t blame it on Israel, I said the imperial war machine. Israel the state is also the product of capitalist imperialism, but they are the beneficiary. I made that pretty clear I think.

                  The poor countries on that list are all the target of structural adjustment policies, which basically say “you need to neglect your population and become indentured servants, and if you don’t we will fucking glass your country.” That last part about glassing them isn’t in the text, but it’s clearly implied by the context these policies take place in. Also the leaders are usually bribed so they will agree more readily.

                  And just because Israeli citizens are “happy” according to some index that you’ve not actually shared, just insisted does exist, has nothing to do with whether the state is on their side. They are generally extremely wealthy people living in an extremely wealthy state that is propped up by US spending. The people who live there are expats from wealthy western countries, which is a privileged sample of a privileged sample.

                  I’ll refer you to Hank’s Razor: “Anything that can be explained by socioeconomic status in a society, it’s probably that rather than the thing that you’re measuring.”

                  This is almost certainly entirely socioeconomic status, directly influenced by geopolitics.

                  Also, Israel’s genocide is not making their people safer. It is endangering them enormously. The state just can’t stop genociding because it’s been given a green light by the US imperial war machine, and that’s just how states behave when they have that kind of power.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          And? You’re allowed to say what you mean, you know.

          Where do the civilians being bombed fall on your spectrum of evil? Do they somehow deserve it in your eyes?

          • rastilin@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, I have to ask. How would you apply this to any other conflict. For example the Allies fighting against Germany. Where did the German civilians fall in the spectrum of evil. Was fighting Germany justified, knowing that German civilians might suffer? If so, how is this situation different?

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Strategic bombing - ie, the indiscriminate bombing of populated areas - was ineffective and immoral, and people at the time condemned it as such, and they were right to do so. It was also wrong to use Japanese cities as testbeds for nuclear arms. There was no real strategic reason to do it.

              So like… don’t do that? Maybe Israel shouldn’t do that, because fucking obviously?

              Like yes, there were bad states on the allied side in WWII as well. You can see that in how they conducted themselves after the war was over, and at many points before that. In fact the policies of the Nazis were directly inspired by US genocides.

              You’re not going to trip me up by bringing up the Nazis. I said states are the enemy of the people, and I meant it.

              None of what I said should be construed as support for the fascist axis powers, that should just be obvious, but I’m sure I have to say it, because people are just going to try it on.

              • rastilin@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you’re still ok with using artillery against a city if the city has an army in it?

        • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Attacking civilians to stop an apartheid from getting more money and support is evil.

          Making up reasons after you target civilians and journalists is another level of evil.

    • frequenttimetraveler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is an 100 year conflict, all the good guys are dead.

      Why do people feel this need to be good/bad. Everybody knows by now how complex is the middle east

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You must be reading a very different slice of the fediverse than I am. I’ve been blocking Nazis, tankies, and other assorted idiots on sight since I started using Lemmy, and I’ve seen maybe a handful of people saying things that could be interpreted as supporting Hamas. They are vastly outnumbered by people decrying the slaughter of civilians and apologists for Israel.

      • rastilin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        My impression is that at least half of fediverse.

        I got that impression too, and the fediverse has lost a lot of its shine recently. People are rushing to say that they support “both sides” and Israel can defend itself… but just not in any way that would be able to stop another attack like October’s from happening. It feels like a lot of people just want to side with Hamas, but don’t want to actually say that out loud.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s been a very eye-opening experience over the past month to see just how little the left cares about victims of violence if they happen to be Jewish.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone on the left, I can’t exactly disagree. When there’s violence against Jews, some people constantly bring up Israel. They respond to a story about antisemitism being on the rise by saying criticism of Israel isn’t antisemitism. And it’s ironic, because by saying that about antisemitic attacks, they’re the ones confusing the two.

            This needs to be pointed out to them more often. I don’t think most of them realize it.

            • probablyaCat@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah. Don’t let the current situation fool you. You’ve seen that I’m very pro-Israel in my other comments. But there are many of us that are lefties through and through. I mean most Jews in the US lean slightly left of the democrats. I lean further. And David ben Gurion was super leftist. Hardcore socialist commie pinko, that one. If I had been around for the founding of Israel, I’d probably have been kicking back on a kibbutz somewhere.

              But the right is definitely not our friend. Most of them support Israel for christo-fascist dreams of the apocalypse. They want to use us. And we should be careful to think that we are the ones using them.

              I do not know where you are from, but especially concerning the US and Europe, I do think it’s important to understand where this support comes from – even if they don’t actually know it either. It’s the underdog problem. Israel is much stronger than in the past. We have won many wars against people who wished to murder us all. We became a force to be reckoned with. And the Palestinian territories are the underdog. And the left has normalized seeing the underdog as the marginalized victim. They are not used to seeing an underdog victimizer. From South Africa to Ireland to PoCs and the LGBT+ communities, they are used to things going one way. And things are not one way. There is a whole 3d plane of possibilities in this world. And that’s why I argue more about Israel than anything else on here. To try to help people see that things are not black and white. This isn’t a left or right issue. This isn’t a David vs Goliath issue. This is something that cannot be boiled down to simple concepts or comparisons. And the more you know, the harder it really is to if not agree with what Israel is doing, to at least understand why they might make the choices they do. And it is not for the sole purpose of ethnic cleansing or genocide. At least not for the majority.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They aren’t going about this in a way that stops this from happening is the problem. You’re so wrapped up in the Zionist narrative that they’ve tricked you into thinking extermination is the final solution.

          Britain didn’t get rid of the IRA by bombing and blockading Ireland. There was no ground invasion despite thousands dying in bombings and other violence.

          The fact is that the attack in October and others like it happen because the extreme Zionists like Likud have taken steps to ensure this. Because they’re creating a situation where they can be horrifically brutal but hide behind good pr narratives. They literally propped up Hamas at its inception with the stated goal of fracturing Fatah which was a moderate party suing for a two state solution.

          As long as Israel keeps killing Palestinians in the West Bank where there IS NO HAMAS, they will keep driving support for any group that resists Israel.

          You can get far more innocent civilians on your side if you treat them better than Hamas. Knowing everything we know about how Hamas treats them should tell you just how bad Israel treats them on top of that.

          You stop this by removing the war mongers from power first and foremost. As long as Netanyahu’s party has control there can never be peace. Because like Hamas, they want a one state solution too.

    • BabyWah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Piece of shit, pouring oil onto fire while the civilians are getting slaughtered at this point on both sides. If there is hell, this one should burn.

      Edit: I’ve never seen anyone defend Hamas, only civilian Palestinians. Just to make that clear distinction.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tactically their October 7 attack was incredibly silly, honestly what did they think would happen?

      They gave Netanyahu, who was finally fumbling at the reigns after almost thirty years aan excuse to execute his wet dreams and all of Israel uniting behind him.

      I see no way how they could have thought the attack would benefit their cause.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To answer the question, what they think would happen: Their October 7th attacked achieved everything they wanted.

        KSA and Israel we’re coming to an understanding and treaty, that was against the interests of Iran who is in a power struggle with the KSA.

        After their attack, it is now politically impossible for the KSA and Israel to have a treaty. That alone justifies this entire conflict from their power politics perspective

        They never had any hope of inflicting damage on the Israeli government. They clearly don’t care about their own civilian casualties. In fact The worst the reprisals the better for their recruitment and funding efforts.

        Probably not directly related to the rationale for their attack, but it got them some ancillary support, it removed Russia’s aggression from the news media cycle. Which probably got them some favor in those circles.

        From a media perspective, this has been a massive Boone for their campaign. They more or less had disappeared from international headlines for the last 10 years. Now everybody is talking about the genocide, and the ethnic cleansing. They’re going to pay very dearly for it, but that’s more media attention than they’ve had for a decade.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok yes I can follow that. The cynical thing is that in none of the reasons the Palestinian people are central. Those are victimized by both the Israelis and Hamas, following this rationale.

          An extra cynical level is that the wished of the extreme right Israelis and Hamas are the same. To keep this war going indefinitely, not matter the cost of human life.

          In what kind of setting would this be proposed? ‘listen we might invite genocidal terror on our own people, but Russia needs some radio silence and we crave media attention’ and everyone involved going like ‘that’s absolutely worth it brother’.

          Maybe I’m too naive, I cannot see the tactical gain in that perspective. Thanks though, for good counter points. It helps me trying to make some kind of sense of this.

            • Akasazh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I know Machiavelli, I don’t remember suicidal tactics, though, and certainly not playing according to ones worst enemies playbook.

              But mass media wasn’t around in the Renaissance…

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The whole philosophy is how to get the outcomes you want, any means are justified.

                Saying person X is playing into person Ys playbook is making huge assumptions about their goals.

                We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

                • Akasazh@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  We can only infer and guess as to the organizational goals at play. We can line up the incentives for their actions, as I did two posts up, and say their behavior is consistent with these incentives.

                  And I thank you for that exposition, however cynical it does give some reason to what appears madness.

                  But if it comes to serving the people of Palestine they aren’t really doing that, rather the opposite.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas killed 1400 civilians.

      The IDF has killed about 9500 civilians so far.

      I dunno, I think that Hamas may not be the good guys, but they’re definitely the less bad guys.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be fair, and I realize it’s difficult to be fair here:

      The Israeli government has said it is going for the total destruction of Hamas. Hamas has said it is going for the total destruction of the Israeli government… They’ve taken up equivalent positions

      I think what that really means, is both belligerents are going to try the radical new policy of killing more random civilians, and seeing if anything changes…

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Israel has said they are going for the total destruction of Hamas. Hamas is a government entity and the ruling government of Gaza.

        Hamas has said they are going for the total destruction of Israel the nation. Including all Jewish civilians. Not the government, all Jewish people in Israel.

        That’s been Hamas’ position for years. They want to eliminate all Jews from the region.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Literally in the article that this post is about, they said they are trying to avoid civilians. It’s blatant fucking lie, but it’s what they’re saying.

          You just said that they’re going publicly, for the destruction of all Jewish people, that contradicts the article that we’re talking about here. If they’re stated goal is the death of Jewish people, why would they try to avoid Jewish casualties, why would they say that? If it’s in their charter shouldn’t they reinforce it when they’re talking in public?

          If we’re pulling in outside sources. https://jewishcurrents.org/a-textbook-case-of-genocide

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope. Quote it then if you’re so sure.

            Nothing in that article at all says they have tried to avoid casualties.

            “Israel is a country that has no place on our land,” Hamad said in an interview with Lebanese TV channel LBC on October 24, which was translated and published Wednesday by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). “We must remove it because it constitutes a security, military and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation. We are not ashamed to say this.”

            In the interview, Hamad said that Israel’s existence is “illogical” and that it must be wiped off all “Palestinian lands,” a term the terror group uses to mean the West Bank, Gaza and Israel, minus the Golan Heights.

            When asked whether this meant the complete annihilation of Israel, Hamas replied: “Yes, of course.”

            “We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do it twice and three times. The Al-Aqsa Deluge [the name Hamas gave its October 7 onslaught] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth,” Hamad continued. “Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs.”

            “We are the victims of the occupation. Period. Therefore, nobody should blame us for the things we do. On October 7, October 10, October one-millionth, everything we do is justified,” Hamad said.

            So they intentionally attacked civilians, this dude is claiming they know they attacked civilians, they will do it again and again and again until they completely eliminate the entire nation of Israel. Which includes all Jews in the region.

            But hey, they claimed the land originally by genociding everyone that lived there too. So it’s par for the course.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know, I was going to point out how terrible his argument is, but there’s no need for that. It should be no surprise that they are just as craven as they say they are.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              He also repeated the false assertion that Hamas had not intended to harm civilians, but that there were “complications” on the ground.

              From the article above

              • steventhedev@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Finish the quote:

                Overwhelming evidence has emerged over the past three weeks of deliberate attacks against Israeli civilians, as part of the instructions given by Hamas commanders. In many cases, the terrorists went from house to house and executed or burned entire families, and some 260 civilians were massacred at an outdoor music festival.

                Your mental gymnastics are Olympic level, mate.

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not defending either government. They both clearly killed civilians intentionally

                  They’ve both made statements they wanted to destroy the opposing government.

                  Pointing that out shouldn’t be controversial.

                  I gave you the relevant part of the quote, from the article, were Hamas was laying out their policy. They’re lying, but their policy as stated is equivalent to the Israeli government policy. Which is exactly what you were asking me to provide in your previous comment

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Did you just threaten to shoot me in the head? You’re threatening violence against me for an internet discussion?

                  Putting that aside, Hamas is a terrible organization, they shouldn’t exist, and they need to be deposed. I’m on board with that.

                  I’m pointing out that both belligerence have taken equivalent positions, that they want to destroy the opposing government. And a lot of civilians are going to die in the middle regardless of the rhetoric.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Literally in the article that this post is about, they said they are trying to avoid civilians.

            Yeah… so… after them killing over 1200 Israelis, the vast majority of them civilians, everyone they could get their hands on basically, I kinda don’t trust them.

            • fiveoar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah… so… after them killing over 5,000 Palestinians, the vast majority of them civilians, everyone they could get their hands on basically, I kinda don’t trust them.

              • anteaters@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                everyone they could get their hands on basically,

                If that utter nonsense was true there would be 100x as many dead.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I’ve done some maths, and I’m pretty sure the IDF can kill the population of Gaza faster than Hamas can kill the population of Israel.

    • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly what Hamas wants to see because that’s what gets Israeli to lose international support and prompts Arab nations to invade.

      They don’t give a shit about the Palestinian people.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not lost them a lot of international support so far, I’ll be honest.

        While they may still be reeling from the loss of Bolivia, the people they do business with on a daily basis have picked their sides and stuck to it.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody is going to invade for humanitarian reasons. That only happens for very weak nations that have no international support.

        The government of Israel has amazing international support, first class weaponry, outclassing all of its neighbors militaries by orders of magnitude, and a ambiguous nuclear strike capability.

        They could literally take every one of their oppressed civilians, drop them into a vat of acid, live streaming on the internet indefinitely, and nobody’s going to invade.

        Give countries something to fight over, some material resource, and there will be a war, water, energy, access to trade, but humanitarian philosophies are things few people are willing to die for.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You said That’s exactly what Hamas wants to see because that’s what gets Israeli to lose international support and prompts Arab nations to invade.

            I had assumed your Arab nation invasion was due to the death of Palestinian civilians. In your scenario why are the Arab nations invading?

            • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because from their perspective someone invaded their land and is now vulnerable to getting kicked off it. The only reason Israel exists is because it’s supported by the US and Europe. Take away that support and Israel goes away.

              The intended result for Hamas is for Israel to respond with actions that erode the very support that they depend on for security against invasion from surrounding arab nations that don’t need any new reasons to attack Israel apart from the very existence of Israel in the first place.

    • rastilin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, just to be clear, you’re saying that the attack against Israel was actually a secret Jewish conspiracy to make Hamas look bad?

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like a way to give Israel a casus belli to turn Gaza into a parking lot.

        Not saying that’s what happened, but as far as theofascist stayed go I wouldn’t be surprised

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t Netanyahu prop up Hamas? That’s all the info I need to know. That and one conversation with a Zionist, they are out of their mind and will straight up say that Palestinians don’t deserve to live. That conversation was over a decade ago and it still gives me the creepy crawlys… it was like talking to a proud Nazi that firmly believed in his ideology.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Zionists fall under the category of most religious extremeist- stupid and dangerous. If we could drop all zionists in a hunger games scenario with all members of hamas, maybe throw the Catholic Church in there too.

            Except nobody wins we just burn it down when they’re done killing each other like they’re going to do anyway.